No abstract

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Subjects with diabetic neuropathy, median motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) Ն40 m/s, and HbA 1c Յ9% were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter study and randomized to 150 mg/day epalrestat or a control group. After excluding the withdrawals, 289 (epalrestat group) and 305 (control group) patients were included in the analyses. The primary end point was change from baseline in median MNCV at 3 years. Secondary end points included assessment of other somatic nerve function parameters (minimum F-wave latency [MFWL] of the median motor nerve and vibration perception threshold [VPT]), cardiovascular autonomic nerve function, and subjective symptoms.RESULTS -Over the 3-year period, epalrestat prevented the deterioration of median MNCV, MFWL, and VPT seen in the control group. The between-group difference in change from baseline in median MNCV was 1.6 m/s (P Ͻ 0.001). Although a benefit with epalrestat was observed in cardiovascular autonomic nerve function variables, this did not reach statistical significance compared with the control group. Numbness of limbs, sensory abnormality, and cramping improved significantly with epalrestat versus the control group. The effects of epalrestat on median MNCV were most evident in subjects with better glycemic control and with no or mild microangiopathies.CONCLUSIONS -Long-term treatment with epalrestat is well tolerated and can effectively delay the progression of diabetic neuropathy and ameliorate the associated symptoms of the disease, particularly in subjects with good glycemic control and limited microangiopathy.

A 52-week multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind parallel group study OBJECTIVE -The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fidarestat, a novel aldose reductase (AR) inhibitor, in a double-blind placebo controlled study in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and associated peripheral neuropathy.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -A total of 279 patients with diabetic neuropathy were treated with placebo or fidarestat at a daily dose of 1 mg for 52 weeks. The efficacy evaluation was based on change in electrophysiological measurements of median and tibial motor nerve conduction velocity, F-wave minimum latency, F-wave conduction velocity (FCV), and median sensory nerve conduction velocity (forearm and distal), as well as an assessment of subjective symptoms.RESULTS -Over the course of the study, five of the eight electrophysiological measures assessed showed significant improvement from baseline in the fidarestat-treated group, whereas no measure showed significant deterioration. In contrast, in the placebo group, no electrophysiological measure was improved, and one measure significantly deteriorated (i.e., median nerve FCV). At the study conclusion, the fidarestat-treated group was significantly improved compared with the placebo group in two electrophysiological measures (i.e., median nerve FCV and minimal latency). Subjective symptoms (including numbness, spontaneous pain, sensation of rigidity, paresthesia in the sole upon walking, heaviness in the foot, and hypesthesia) benefited from fidarestat treatment, and all were significantly improved in the treated versus placebo group at the study conclusion. At the dose used, fidarestat was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile that did not significantly differ from that seen in the placebo group.CONCLUSIONS -The effects of fidarestat-treatment on nerve conduction and the subjective symptoms of diabetic neuropathy provide evidence that this treatment alters the progression of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 24:1776 -1782, 2001D iabetic neuropathy is a degenerative disorder triggered by persistent hyperglycemia. The degenerative changes, consisting of axonal atrophy, demyelination, nerve fiber loss, and disordered nerve fiber repair, develop and progress even in the early stage of diabetes. Axonal atrophy, demyelination, and disordered repair can be clinically assessed as a decline in nerve conduction velocity. During hyperglycemia, nerve maturation secondary to nerve fiber loss is also disturbed. Abnormal excitement of these immaturely regenerated nerve fibers causes spontaneous pain, numbness, and paresthesia (1-3). In the majority of patients, these changes, characteristic of diabetic neuropathy, considerably deteriorate the quality of life.After the onset of subjective symptoms, only palliative treatments are currently available. Accordingly, early diagnosis and treatment before the onset of subjective symptoms is considered essential. Diabetic neuropathy is a long-term complication of diabetes that should not be underestimated, bec...

Tryptophan metabolites in plasma samples from 20 male subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 20 nondiabetic reference males were analyzed by ultra high performance liquid chromatography. Tryptophan levels in the diabetic subjects were significantly lower than those in nondiabetic subjects. The concentrations of 5-hydroxytryptophan, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, kynurenic acid, 3-hydroxykynurenine, 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid, and xanthurenic acid were found to be higher in the diabetic patients. When the diabetic patients were divided into higher-and lower-tryptophan groups, the concentrations of 5-hydroxytryptophan, indole-3-acetic acid, kynurenine, 5-hydroxykynurenine, and kynurenic acid were found to be higher in the diabetic patients with higher tryptophan levels. However, diabetic patients with lower plasma tryptophan levels had higher levels of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid than the patients with higher tryptophan levels. These results suggest that tryptophan was metabolized more in T2DM patients than in nondiabetic subjects. In the kynurenine pathway, the degradation of tryptophan seems to be accelerated in patients with higher plasma levels of tryptophan than in patients with lower levels of tryptophan. In the serotonin pathway, when the level of tryptophan is low, the conversion of serotonin to 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid appears to be accelerated. In conclusion, our results suggest that T2DM patients may be exposed to stress constantly.

Background: The Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study 2 (CSPS 2) showed that cilostazol significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 25.7% relative to aspirin, with significantly fewer hemorrhagic events, in patients with prior ischemic stroke, excluding cardioembolic stroke. However, whether the benefit of cilostazol is sustained in patients with a high risk of bleeding has not been examined. Methods: We conducted a subanalysis of CSPS 2 to examine whether known risk factors for hemorrhagic stroke, such as stroke subtype and systolic blood pressure (SBP), influence the efficacy of the study drugs on hemorrhagic stroke. The relative risk reduction of hemorrhagic stroke was determined from the incidences calculated by the person-year method. The cumulative incidence rates of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke were estimated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Incidences of serious hemorrhage and hemorrhage requiring hospital admission were also evaluated in the two treatment groups. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated by the Cox proportion hazard model for cilostazol versus aspirin were assessed, and a log-rank test was used for the comparison between treatments. Results: The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with prior lacunar stroke (0.36 vs. 1.20% in person-year, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p < 0.01), but not among those with prior atherothrombotic stroke (0.31 vs. 0.59% in person-year, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.14-2.0, p = 0.34). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group throughout all SBP categories (Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p < 0.01) including SBP above 140 mm Hg (cilostazol 0.45% vs. aspirin 1.44% in person-year; Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p = 0.02). Cilostazol, compared with aspirin, significantly reduced the incidence of cerebral hemorrhage (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.70, p < 0.01), overall hemorrhage requiring hospital admission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97, p = 0.04), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding requiring hospital admission (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.90, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Hemorrhagic stroke was less frequent in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with lacunar stroke as well as those with increased blood pressure levels. As for extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, GI bleeding was also less frequent in the cilostazol than in the aspirin group. Cilostazol is supposed to be a therapeutic option to replace aspirin for secondary stroke prevention, especially in these subgroups with high risks for hemorrhagic events.