With the advent and rapid growth of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in the world education market in the last decade, online learning technologies are becoming increasingly widespread not only in the non-formal education sector but also in higher and supplementary vocational education. The use of MOOCs for implementing educational programs at the universities opens wide opportunities in terms of expanding the educational choice of students, the development of virtual academic mobility, reducing the cost of educational services, and improving the accessibility of education. However, the effectiveness of using different online learning technologies in the educational process of universities and the consequences of their widespread adoption has not been sufficiently explored.In this research a comparative analysis based on an empirical study of the application of different online-learning models in the educational process within a university was carried out. An experiment was undertaken in which different groups of students of the Ural Federal University were encouraged to master some disciplines in the framework of a blended learning model and an online learning model with tutoring support. The results of the pilot study were compared with the training results of a control group of students who mastered the same disciplines in a traditional taught format. It was shown that both models using MOOCs in the educational process demonstrated greater effectiveness in comparison with the traditional model; both in terms of educational outcomes of students and in terms of their satisfaction with the learning process. For engineering and technical disciplines, there is no statistically significant difference in using blended or online learning technologies, whereas for humanitarian disciplines, where the communicative component of the learning process is significant, the blended learning technology produced better results. Conclusions of the empirical research can be useful for heads of educational organizations and teachers in the modernization of the educational process, improving teaching methods, and increasing the effectiveness of new educational technologies. The results of the research will also be used for implementing the State Priority Project "The Modern Digital Educational Environment of the Russian Federation".
Some students perceive that online assessment does not provide for a true reflection of their work effort. This article reports on a collaborative international project between two higher education institutions with the aim of researching issues relating to engineering student perceptions with respect to online assessment of mathematics. It provides a comparison between students of similar educational standing in Finland and Ireland. The students undertook to complete questionnaires and a sample of students was selected to participate in several group discussion interviews. Evidence from the data suggests that many of the students demonstrate low levels of confidence, do not display knowledge of continuous assessment processes and perceive many barriers when confronted with online assessment in their first semester. Alternative perspectives were sought from lecturers by means of individual interviews. The research indicates that perceptions of effort and reward as seen by students are at variance with those held by lecturers. The study offers a brief insight into the thinking of students in the first year of their engineering mathematics course. It may be suggested that alternative approaches to curriculum and pedagogical design are necessary to alleviate student concerns.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.