No abstract

Object. The authors describe a new magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique to demonstrate the status of the cervical nerve roots involved in brachial plexus injury. They discuss the accuracy and reproducibility of a MR imaging—derived classification for diagnosis of nerve root avulsion compared with those of myelography combined with computerized tomography (CT) myelography. Methods. The overlapping coronal—oblique slice MR imaging procedure was performed in 35 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury and 10 healthy individuals. The results were retrospectively evaluated and classified into four major categories (normal rootlet, rootlet injuries, avulsion, and meningocele) after confirming the diagnosis by surgical exploration with or without spinal evoked potential (EP) measurements and by referring to myelography and CT myelography findings. The reliability and reproducibility of the MR imaging—based classification was prospectively assessed by eight independent observers, and its diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of traditional myelography/CT myelography classification, correlated with surgical and spinal EP findings in another 50 cervical roots in 10 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury. Conclusions. In the retrospective study in which MR imaging and myelography/CT myelography findings involving 175 cervical roots in 35 patients were compared, the sensitivity of detection of the cervical nerve root avulsion was the same (92.9%) with both modalities. In the prospective study, interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility showed that there was no statistically significant difference between MR imaging and myelography/CT myelography and that their accuracy for detecting cervical root avulsion was the same as that in the retrospective study. The overlapping coronal—oblique slice MR imaging technique is a reliable and reproducible method for detecting nerve root avulsion. The information provided by this modality enabled the authors to assess the roots of the brachial plexus and provided valuable data for helping to decide whether to proceed with exploration, nerve repair, primary reconstruction, or other imaging modalities.

Limb-sparing surgery is the preferred approach in the management of patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas when local disease can be completely resected. However, conventional treatment focuses only on restoration of basic functions to the remnant limb. Lost functions are not restored to normal, leaving the patient with variable degrees of functional disabilities. This in turn may necessitate further massive reconstructive procedures. Transferred reinnervated free muscles were used to reconstruct functions lost after radical resection of malignant soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities in 17 patients. The long-term functional outcome included survival of transplanted muscle, speed of neural recovery, and muscle strength and disabilities. All muscles survived. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 27 to 106 months. All muscles except those in a 75-year-old patient were successfully reinnervated. Powerful strength and almost normal limb functions were obtained. Functional scoring of the patients according to the rating system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society was 87 percent for the lower extremity and 93 percent for the upper extremity. All patients are presently disease-free. Use of the reinnervated free-muscle transfer in limb-sparing surgery after resection of soft-tissue sarcoma in the extremity may be indicated in the young adult when radical excision of the tumor will result in severe motor functional loss, provided adequate clearance can be obtained and that there is no presence of distant metastasis.

One pattern of injury to the brachial plexus shows recovery of the fifth and sixth cervical nerves but little else. These patients have useful shoulders and functional elbow flexion, but elbow and wrist extension is weak or absent. Their hand function is negligible. We restored hand function in three such patients using free functioning muscle transfer for finger flexion and transfer of the sensory rami of the intercostal nerve to the ulnar nerve for sensation. Supplementary operations to restore elbow and wrist extension were necessary in one patient.