Several studies have investigated the accuracy of cervical auscultation (CA). However, both the sensitivities and the specificities of CA in detecting dysphagic conditions varied widely among these studies. These wide variations of the accuracy of CA might be caused by differences of the targeted sounds, such as the expiratory sound (ES) and/or swallowing sound (SS). Forty‐six dysphagic patients were served as subjects. Patients who had unoccluded tracheostoma and patients who could not follow the instructions were excluded. During the videofluorographic swallowing study (VFSS), the subjects swallowed 3 ml of yogurt containing barium sulfate. The VFSS images were recorded with acoustic signals including both the swallowing and respiratory sounds detected by our method. Classification of the VFSS images was decided by consensus of the three dentists using a penetration‐aspiration scale (PAS). Recorded VFSS images were classified into the following 2 groups based on PAS: “no or minimum risk group”: PAS1–2; and “possible risk group”: PAS3–8. As a result of the classification of VFSS findings, 30 samples were evaluated as no or minimum risk group and 16 as possible risk group. Twelve observers including 10 dentists other than 3 dentists who evaluated VFSS images and 2 speech pathologists auditorily diagnosed “negative” and “positive.” Sensitivity, specificity, and intra‐rater reliability was calculated for the 3 types of acoustic samples. The sensitivity of the intra‐rater reliability was 60.3% for ES, 76.6% for SS, and 89.9% for ES + SS. The sensitivity of intra‐rater reliability of ES + SS samples was significantly higher than that of ES (p < .01) and SS (p < .05). The sensitivity of intra‐rater reliability of SS was significantly higher than that of ES (p < .01). The specificity of the intra‐rater reliability was 53.7% for ES, 50.3% for SS, and 44.5% for ES + SS. ES + SS might be most useful for detecting the presence of material in the airway.

Purpose: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experience various posttreatment side effects that decrease quality of life (QOL). Some previous study reported that QOL of HHC patients were returned baseline (before treatment) after a year post treatment. However, acute stage longitudinal changes of QOL in HNC patients remains unclear. This point might be important for early reintegration of HNC patients. This study aimed to investigate the acute stage longitudinal change of the relationship between QOL and oral function in HNC patients had surgery. Methods: 45 HNC patients (23 men) scheduled for surgical treatment were enrolled in this study. Primary tumor sites were 22 tongue, 5 maxilla, 4 mandible, 3 pharynx and others. Weight, body mass index (BMI), whole body soft lean mass (SLM), and skeletal muscle mass (SMM) were evaluated as muscle mass-related measurements. Lip closure force (LC) and tongue pressure (TP) were evaluated as oral function measurements. Feeding function was evaluated using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire QLQ-C30 and H&N 35. Measures were evaluated at pre-surgical treatment (PT), and 1 month (1M) and 3 months (3M) after surgery. The change of QOL parameters and relationships between measurements were assessed. Results: For QOL assessments, role functioning, fatigue, speech problems, trouble with social eating, trouble with social contact, and opening mouth significantly decreased from PT to 1M, but significantly increased from 1M to 3M. Weight, BMI, SLM, SMM, LC, TP, and FOIS demonstrated significant relationships with QOL from PT to 1M. Meanwhile, from 1M to 3M, weight, BMI, SLM, SMM, LC, and FOIS showed significant relationships with QOL assessments. Conclusions: Both oral function and muscle mass-related measurements significantly affected QOL in HNC patients.

Clinically, the stable sole‐ground contact in the diet is considered as important for achieving safe swallows in the dysphagic patients. However, the effects of varied sole‐ground contacts on swallow‐related muscles activities remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of sole‐ground contacts on the muscle activities during swallow for various materials; 26 healthy adult subjects participated in this study. Three different sole‐ground contact conditions were investigated; sole‐ground contact with knees bent to 90° (KB 90°), sole‐ground contact with knees bent to 135° (KB 135°), and sole‐ground off the floor (Off). Participants swallowed four bolus materials (saliva, 5‐ml water, 10‐ml water, and 5‐ml yogurt) in each sole‐ground contact condition. The muscular activities of the suprahyoid (SH) muscle and the sternocleidomastoid muscle during swallowing were detected and recorded using surface electromyography. The sole‐ground contact pressure was evaluated using the data acquisition system. Duration of SH during 10‐ml water swallow for Off was significantly longer than that for KB 90°. Duration of SH during 5‐ml yogurt swallow for Off was significantly longer than that for KB 90°. Integration of SH during 10‐ml water swallow for Off was significantly greater than that for KB 135°. Integration of SH during 5‐ml yogurt swallow for Off was significantly greater than that for KB 90°. No significant differences were found in peak of SH. Sole‐ground contact conditions had significant effect on swallow‐related muscles activities. The stable sitting positions might be more advantageous for performing effective swallows compared with less stable sitting positions.

Effectiveness of postural control techniques to compensate for oropharyngeal dysphagia have been recommended and used by several clinicians. However, the inter‐rater reliability of these techniques is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to clarify the ambiguity of postural control techniques using statistical analyses. A total of 50 clinicians involved in dysphagia treatment participated in this study, where a healthy male served as the simulated patient. The following clinically used postures were measured by two investigators on two separate days: chin down, right/left incline, and right/left rotation. Postural angles were measured twice by two investigators on each day. Data obtained for the angle of each posture were visually displayed. Data from both investigators were assessed for each posture using the Youden plot, which analyzes data variability for systematic errors and accidental errors separately. The correlation coefficient for examining the measurement error between investigators was calculated. The results showed considerable variation between clinicians regarding the postures used, and significant differences were noted each day. The correlation coefficient for a total of four measurements was more often lower on Day 2 than that on Day 1. The details of the instructions provided by clinicians were not fixed, and the same specified posture was not reproduced even when instructions were provided to the same subject. These findings suggest poor inter‐rater reliability because of the variability of selected postures when using statistical analyses. Therefore, standardized postures need to be developed that can be easily measured and reproduced.