No abstract

Background Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs want to employ a selection process that will rank best possible applicants for admission into the specialty. Objective We tested if application data are associated with resident performance using EM milestone assessments. We hypothesized that a weak correlation would exist between some selection factors and milestone outcomes. Methods Utilizing data from 5 collaborating residency programs, a secondary analysis was performed on residents trained from 2013 to 2018. Factors in the model were gender, underrepresented in medicine status, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK), Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA), grades (EM, medicine, surgery, pediatrics), advanced degree, Standardized Letter of Evaluation global assessment, rank list position, and controls for year assessed and program. The primary outcomes were milestone level achieved in the core competencies. Multivariate linear regression models were fitted for each of the 23 competencies with comparisons made between each model's results. Results For the most part, academic performance in medical school (Step 1, 2 CK, grades, AOA) was not associated with residency clinical performance on milestones. Isolated correlations were found between specific milestones (eg, higher surgical grade increased wound care score), but most had no correlation with residency performance. Conclusions Our study did not find consistent, meaningful correlations between the most common selection factors and milestones at any point in training. This may indicate our current selection process cannot consistently identify the medical students who are most likely to be high performers as residents.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on undergraduate medical education with limitation of patient care activities and disruption to medical licensing examinations. In an effort to promote both safety and equity, the emergency medicine (EM) community has recommended no away rotations for EM applicants and entirely virtual interviews during this year’s residency application cycle. These changes affect the components of the EM residency application most highly regarded by program directors – Standardized Letters of Evaluation from EM rotations, board scores, and interactions during the interview. The Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine Application Process Improvement Committee suggests solutions not only for the upcoming year but also to address longstanding difficulties within the process, encouraging residency programs to leverage these challenges as an opportunity for disruptive innovation.

This study demonstrates a high prevalence of IPV among HCWs and identifies prevailing attitudes regarding IPV. This knowledge is essential in developing effective, appropriate training programs and identifies a need to address IPV among the healthcare workforce.

ImportanceGaps in readiness for indirect supervision have been identified for essential responsibilities encountered early in residency, presenting risks to patient safety. Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for entering residency have been proposed as a framework to address these gaps and strengthen the transition from medical school to residency.ObjectiveTo assess progress in developing an entrustment process in the Core EPAs framework.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this quality improvement study in the Core EPAs for Entering Residency Pilot, trained faculty made theoretical entrustment determinations and recorded the number of workplace-based assessments (WBAs) available for each determination in 2019 and 2020. Four participating schools attempted entrustment decision-making for all graduating students or a randomly selected subset of students. Deidentified, individual-level data were merged into a multischool database.InterventionsSchools implemented EPA-related curriculum, WBAs, and faculty development; developed systems to compile and display data; and convened groups to make theoretical summative entrustment determinations.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOn an EPA-specific basis, the percentage of students for whom an entrustment determination could be made, the percentage of students ready for indirect supervision, and the volume of WBAs available were recorded.ResultsFour participating schools made 4525 EPA-specific readiness determinations (2296 determinations in 2019 and 2229 determinations in 2020) for 732 graduating students (349 students in 2019 and 383 students in 2020). Across all EPAs, the proportion of determinations of “ready for indirect supervision” increased from 2019 to 2020 (997 determinations [43.4%] vs 1340 determinations [60.1%]; 16.7 percentage point increase; 95% CI, 13.8-19.6 percentage points; P < .001), as did the proportion of determinations for which there were 4 or more WBAs (456 of 2295 determinations with WBA data [19.9%] vs 938 [42.1%]; 22.2 percentage point increase; 95% CI, 19.6-24.8 percentage points; P < .001). The proportion of EPA-specific data sets considered for which an entrustment determination could be made increased from 1731 determinations (75.4%) in 2019 to 2010 determinations (90.2%) in 2020 (14.8 percentage point increase; 95% CI, 12.6-16.9 percentage points; P < .001). On an EPA-specific basis, there were 5 EPAs (EPA 4 [orders], EPA 8 [handovers], EPA 10 [urgent care], EPA 11 [informed consent], and EPA 13 [patient safety]) for which few students were deemed ready for indirect supervision and for which there were few WBAs available per student in either year. For example, for EPA 13, 0 of 125 students were deemed ready in 2019 and 0 of 127 students were deemed ready in 2020, while 0 determinations in either year included 4 or more WBAs.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that there was progress in WBA data collected, the extent to which entrustment determinations could be made, and proportions of entrustment determinations reported as ready for indirect supervision. However, important gaps remained, particularly for a subset of Core EPAs.