No abstract

Smoking promotes arteriosclerosis and is one of the most important coronary risk factors. However, few studies have investigated the association between smoking habits and the severity of coronary stenosis as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). We enrolled 416 patients [165/251 = smoker (past and current)/non-smoker)]. They had all undergone CTA and either were clinically suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) or had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. We divided the patients into smoking and non-smoking groups, and evaluated the presence of CAD, the number of significantly stenosed coronary vessels (VD), and the Gensini score as assessed by CTA in the two groups. The incidence of CAD, VD, the Gensini score, and coronary calcification score in the smoking group were all significantly greater than those in the non-smoking group (CAD, p = 0.009; VD, p = 0.003; Gensini score, p = 0.007; coronary calcification score, p = 0.01). Pack-year was significantly associated with VD and the Gensini score, and was strongly associated with multi-vessel disease (2- and 3-VD) (p < 0.05), whereas the duration of cessation in past smokers was not associated with VD or the Gensini score. Pack-year, but not the duration of cessation, may be the most important factor that was associated with the severity of coronary stenosis in terms of VD and the Gensini score.

GA may be superior to HbA1c as a marker for evaluating the presence of CAD.

We hypothesized that cholesterol efflux capacity is more useful than the lipid profile as a marker of the presence and the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, we investigated the associations between the presence and the severity of CAD and both the percentage of cholesterol efflux capacity and total cholesterol efflux capacity and the lipid profile including the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level in patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). The subjects consisted of 204 patients who were clinically suspected to have CAD and underwent CTA. We isolated HDL from plasma by ultracentrifugation and measured the percentage of cholesterol efflux capacity using H-cholesterol-labeled J774 macrophage cells and calculated total cholesterol efflux capacity as follows: the percentage of cholesterol efflux capacity/100× HDL-C levels. While the percentage of cholesterol efflux capacity was not associated with the presence or the severity of CAD, total cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL-C in patients with CAD were significantly lower than those in patients without CAD. In addition, total cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL-C, but not the percentage of cholesterol efflux capacity, significantly decreased as the number of coronary arteries with significant stenosis increased. Total cholesterol efflux capacity was positively correlated with HDL-C, whereas the percentage of cholesterol efflux capacity showed only weak association. In a logistic regression analysis, the presence of CAD was independently associated with total cholesterol efflux capacity, in addition to age and gender. Finally, a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the areas under the curves for total cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL-C were similar. In conclusion, the percentage of cholesterol efflux capacity using the fixed amount of isolated HDL was not associated with CAD. On the other hand, the calculated total cholesterol efflux capacity that was dependent of HDL-C levels had a significant correlation with the presence of CAD.

SummaryMany patients still have high blood pressure (BP) after treatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor blockers (ARBs). We compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan to those of olmesartan in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Sixty-four hypertensive patients who were treated with ARBs other than azilsartan and olmesartan were enrolled in this study. We randomly assigned patients to changeover from their prior ARBs to either azilsartan or olmesartan, and followed the patients for 3 months. Systolic BP (SBP) in the azilsartan group was significantly decreased at 3 months, and diastolic BP (DBP) and pulse rate (PR) in the olmesartan group showed significant reductions after 3 months. There were no significant differences in ΔSBP, ΔDBP, or ΔPR (Δ = the value at 3 months minus the value at 0 months) between the groups. Serum levels of creatinine (Cr), uric acid (UA), and potassium (K) in the azilsartan group significantly increased after 3 months. While the changes in Cr, UA, and K were within the respective normal ranges, ΔSBP was positively associated with ΔCr in the azilsartan group. In conclusion, there was no difference in the depressor effects of azilsartan and olmesartan, and there were no serious changes in biochemical parameters with azilsartan and olmesartan. (Int Heart J 2017; 58: 416-421) Key words: Blood pressure, Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, Uric acid S even types of angiotensin II type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor blockers (ARBs) have been developed and are available for clinical use in Japan.1) ARBs is effective in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, including hypertension and heart failure.1,2) ARBs have been reported to have class-specific (common) and moleculespecific (differential) effects in basic experimental studies. 3)We have proposed that small differences in the molecular structures of ARBs could lead to differences in their abilities to influence the AT 1 receptor. 3,4) Azilsartan is the newest ARB to be approved for clinical use in Japan, and has a significant blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect, although the next generation ARBs could be a significant breakthrough in the field of cardiovascular medicine. 5)Azilsartan medoxomil and azilsartan have been reported to have greater antihypertensive effects than other ARBs.6-9) Azilsartan has been shown to bind tightly to and dissociate slowly from AT 1 receptors.10) Therefore, we hypothesized that the depressor effect of azilsartan may be superior to those of other ARBs in patients with hypertension (HTN). In this study, we performed a changeover from their prior ARBs to azilsartan or olmesartan in patients with hypertension, and compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan to those of olmesartan in a prospective randomized clinical trial. MethodsStudy design: Sixty-four hypertensive patients who were treated with ARBs except for azilsartan and olmesartan were enrolled. We applied a changeover of ARBs, where patients were prospectively and randomly switched from their prior ARBs, except for azilsartan and ...