Two recent trends in philanthropy-increased focus on measurable outcomes and greater investment in capacity building or organizational effectiveness-lead to an important question: How should we go about measuring the effectiveness of capacity-building efforts? Consulting and evaluation perspectives offer two very different, sometimes conflicting approaches to it. Without sound and positive evaluation results, the foundations that have been behind the capacity-building trend are unlikely to continue to make these kinds of much needed resources available to nonprofits generally, whether they in truth work or not. Seven unresolved issues, that neither consultants nor evaluators can so far answer, put continued funding for capacity building at risk. The article lays out the seven issues and discusses their implications for the design, management, and evaluation of capacity-building initiatives. The article closes with next steps for moving forward.
Despite extensive research on feedback and almost complete agreement on its power to effect learning, there is little theoretical understanding of the concept. Its ultrabroad definition and difficulties operationalizing both its causal mechanisms and the learning it supposedly effects have hampered understanding. The particular language used favors certain explanations and lines of research over others. Implications for group facilitation and the design of experiential learning programs are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.