The objective of this study was to estimate direct and indirect selection potential for length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy in Finnish Large White and Landrace swine populations. To study the direct selection potential, the heritabilities of these traits were estimated. The genetic correlations of length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy with prolificacy traits and overall leg conformation were estimated to evaluate whether selection for these traits could indirectly improve measures of sow longevity. In addition, correlations between length of productive life, lifetime prolificacy, ADG, and backfat thickness were estimated. Records were used from Finnish purebred Landrace (n = 26,744) and Large White (n = 24,007) sows born on operations that perform on-farm production tests on all females. Heritabilities were estimated using both a survival analysis procedure and a linear model. Due to computational limitations, correlations were estimated with the linear model only. Estimated length of productive life heritabilities obtained from linear model analyses were less (0.05 to 0.10) than those obtained from survival analyses (0.16 to 0.19). This may be indicative of the superiority of survival analysis compared with linear model analysis methods when evaluating longevity or similar types of data. All the prolificacy traits were genetically correlated with length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy, and the correlations were greater than 0.13. These results indicate that selection for increased number of piglets weaned in the first litter and for short first farrowing interval is beneficial for sow longevity and also for sow's lifetime prolificacy. The genetic correlations between length of productive life and leg conformation score also were favorable (0.32 in Landrace and 0.17 in Large White). The heritability estimates indicate that survival analysis is likely the most appropriate method of evaluating longevity traits in swine. Because of computational problems, simultaneous analysis of linear traits and longevity is not currently possible. More research is needed to develop methods for multiple linear and survival trait analyses.
An evaluation of porcine longissimus myoglobin concentration was conducted to determine breed and gender differences for myoglobin content, estimate genetic parameters for myoglobin concentration, and determine the relationship between myoglobin content and objective measures of muscle color. Data from centrally tested (n = 255), purebred Yorkshire (42), Duroc (61), Hampshire (17), Chester White (28), Berkshire (67), Poland China (28), and Landrace (12) barrows and gilts from the 1999 National Barrow Show Sire Progeny Test were used. Ultimate pH and Hunter L were measured on the 10th-rib face 24 h postmortem. A section of bone-in loin containing the 10th rib was taken to the Iowa State University Meats Laboratory. At 48 h postmortem, Hunter L, CIE L*, a*, and b*, Japanese color score, and water-holding capacity were measured on the face of the 10th-rib loin chop. A slice from the 10th-rib loin section was evaluated for percentage of i.m. fat. The resulting loin chop was used for the determination of soluble myoglobin concentration (mg/g, wet basis). Chester White, Hampshire, and Duroc pigs had the highest (P < 0.05) myoglobin concentration (0.92, 0.95, and 0.85 mg/g, respectively), whereas Landrace had the lowest (0.62 mg/g; P < 0.05). No gender differences were detected for myoglobin concentration. The heritability estimate for soluble myoglobin concentration was 0.27. Residual correlations between soluble myoglobin and CIE L*, a*, b*, Hunter L (24 h), Hunter L (48 h), and Japanese color score were -0.17, 0.23, -0.15, -0.16, -0.13, and 0.13, respectively. These correlations are low but in the desired direction. The residual correlation between soluble myoglobin and intramuscular fat percent was 0.18. Results show that myoglobin concentration has a moderate heritability and could be used in a selection program to make pork loins darker in color.
A study was conducted to evaluate differences in meat and eating quality traits between purebred Duroc pigs sired by boars currently available and pigs sired by boars from the mid 1980s. Two lines were developed by randomly allocating littermate and half-sib pairs of females to matings by current time period (CTP) or old time period (OTP) boars. Matings by CTP boars were made using fresh semen, and matings by OTP boars were via frozen semen. All available barrows and randomly selected gilts were sent to a commercial abattoir and used for meat and eating quality evaluation. A total of 178 pigs from 23 CTP sires and 99 pigs from 15 OTP sires, across 2 replications and at a mean live weight of 109 kg, were slaughtered and analyzed. Chemical intramuscular fat percentage was determined by lab analysis of a slice from the LM at the 10th rib. Additional meat and eating quality traits measured on the LM were Minolta reflectance and Hunter L color (24 h); pH (24 h and 7 d); water-holding capacity; subjective visual scores for color, marbling, and firmness (48 h); Instron tenderness; cooking loss; and trained sensory panel evaluations (7 d). Time period differences were assessed by use of a mixed model that included fixed effects of sire time period, replication, sex, contemporary group, and the interaction of sex x time period. The random effect of dam and the random effect of sire nested within time period were also included. Loins from pigs sired by OTP boars had greater intramuscular fat (3.48 vs. 3.09%) and visual marbling scores (3.54 vs. 3.07), required less Instron force (5.31 vs. 5.98 kg) to compress, and had darker visual color scores (4.09 vs. 3.87) compared with loins from pigs sired by CTP boars (P < 0.05). No differences were observed between time periods for Minolta reflectance, Hunter L (24 h), water-holding capacity, pH (24 h and 7 d), or subjective firmness scores. Trained sensory evaluations revealed more pork flavor and less off-flavor (P < 0.05) for OTP-sired pigs; however, no differences in tenderness score, juiciness score, chewiness score, or cooking loss were found between lines. Long-term selection response in carcass composition has been at the expense of meat and eating quality traits.
Progeny (n = 589) of randomly mated Duroc pigs were used to determine the genetic and phenotypic relationships between individual s.c. backfat layers and i.m. fat percent (IMF) of the longissimus. Five days before slaughter, cross-sectional ultrasound images were collected at the 10th rib by a National Swine Improvement Federation-certified ultrasound technician using an ultrasound machine (Aloka 500 SSD) fitted with a 12-cm linear array transducer. Off-midline backfat (SBF) and loin muscle area (SLMA) were measured. Individual s.c. backfat layers were measured at the same location: outer (OBF), middle (MBF), and inner (IBF). Off-midline backfat (CBF) and loin muscle area (CLMA) were measured on the carcass 24 h postmortem. A slice from the 10th rib of the loin muscle was obtained for determination of IMF. Heritability estimates and genetic correlations were calculated fitting all possible two-trait animal models in MATVEC (Wang et al., 2003). The heritabilities for OBF, MBF, IBF, CBF, SBF, and IMF were 0.63, 0.45, 0.53, 0.48, 0.44, and 0.69, respectively. The genetic correlations of OBF, MBF, and IBF with IMF were 0.36, 0.16, and 0.28, respectively, and the genetic correlations of CBF and SBF with IMF were 0.25 and 0.27, respectively. Genetic correlations between OBF and MBF, OBF and IBF, and MBF and IBF were 0.43, 0.45, and 0.67, respectively. Results demonstrate that individual backfat layers are highly heritable, of similar magnitude to total backfat, and have similar genetic correlations with IMF. Individual backfat layers could become candidate traits for implementation into a multiple-trait genetic evaluation to improve IMF, while minimizing the detrimental effect on total backfat depth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.