In this study, the super-resolution convolutional neural network (SRCNN) scheme, which is the emerging deep-learning-based super-resolution method for enhancing image resolution in chest CT images, was applied and evaluated using the post-processing approach. For evaluation, 89 chest CT cases were sampled from The Cancer Imaging Archive. The 89 CT cases were divided randomly into 45 training cases and 44 external test cases. The SRCNN was trained using the training dataset. With the trained SRCNN, a high-resolution image was reconstructed from a low-resolution image, which was down-sampled from an original test image. For quantitative evaluation, two image quality metrics were measured and compared to those of the conventional linear interpolation methods. The image restoration quality of the SRCNN scheme was significantly higher than that of the linear interpolation methods (p < 0.001 or p < 0.05). The high-resolution image reconstructed by the SRCNN scheme was highly restored and comparable to the original reference image, in particular, for a ×2 magnification. These results indicate that the SRCNN scheme significantly outperforms the linear interpolation methods for enhancing image resolution in chest CT images. The results also suggest that SRCNN may become a potential solution for generating high-resolution CT images from standard CT images.

No abstract

Purpose: To apply and evaluate a super-resolution scheme based on the super-resolution convolutional neural network (SRCNN) for enhancing image resolution in digital mammograms. Materials and Methods: A total of 711 mediolateral oblique (MLO) images including breast lesions were sampled from the Curated Breast Imaging Subset of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (CBIS-DDSM). We first trained the super-resolution convolutional neural network (SRCNN), which is a deep-learning based super-resolution method. Using this trained SRCNN, high-resolution images were reconstructed from low-resolution images. We compared the image quality of the super-resolution method and that obtained using the linear interpolation methods (nearest neighbor and bilinear interpolations). To investigate the relationship between the image quality of the SRCNN-processed images and the clinical features of the mammographic lesions, we compared the image quality yielded by implementing the SRCNN, in terms of the breast density, the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment, and the verified pathology information. For quantitative evaluation, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) were measured to assess the image restoration quality and the perceived image quality. Results: The super-resolution image quality yielded by the SRCNN was significantly higher than that obtained using linear interpolation methods (p < 0.001). The SRCNN-processed image quality in dense breasts, high-risk BI-RADS assessment groups, and pathology-verified malignant cases were significantly higher than that in low-density breasts, low-risk BI-RADS assessment groups, and benign cases, respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusion: SRCNN can significantly outperform conventional interpolation methods for enhancing image resolution in digital mammography. SRCNN can significantly improve the image quality of magnified mammograms, especially in dense breasts, high-risk How to cite this paper:

We have developed a deep learning-based approach to improve image quality of single-shot turbo spin-echo (SSTSE) images of female pelvis. We aimed to compare the deep learning-based single-shot turbo spin-echo (DL-SSTSE) images of female pelvis with turbo spin-echo (TSE) and conventional SSTSE images in terms of image quality. One hundred five and 21 subjects were used as training and test sets, respectively. We performed 6-fold cross validation. In the training process, low-quality images were generated from TSE images as input. TSE images were used as ground truth images. In the test process, the trained convolutional neural network was applied to SSTSE images. The output images were denoted as DL-SSTSE images. Apart from DL-SSTSE images, classical filtering methods were adopted to SSTSE images. Generated images were denoted as F-SSTSE images. Contrast ratio (CR) of gluteal fat and myometrium and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of gluteal fat were measured for all images. Two radiologists graded these images using a 5-point scale and evaluated the image quality with regard to overall image quality, contrast, noise, motion artifact, boundary sharpness of layers in the uterus, and the conspicuity of the ovaries. CRs, SNRs, and image quality scores were compared using the Steel-Dwass multiple comparison tests. CRs and SNRs were significantly higher in DL-SSTSE, F-SSTSE, and TSE images than in SSTSE images. Scores with regard to overall image quality, contrast, noise, and boundary sharpness of layers in the uterus were significantly higher on DL-SSTSE and TSE images than on SSTSE images. There were no significant differences in the CRs, SNRs, and respective scores between DL-SSTSE and TSE images. The score with regard to motion artifacts was significantly higher on DL-SSTSE, F-SSTSE, and SSTSE images than on TSE images. The score with regard to the conspicuity of ovaries was significantly higher on DL-SSTSE images than on F-SSTSE, SSTSE, and TSE images (P < .001). DL-SSTSE images showed higher image quality as compared with SSTSE images. In comparison with conventional TSE images, DL-SSTSE images had acceptable image quality while keeping the advantage of the motion artifact-robustness and acquisition time efficiency in SSTSE imaging.

No abstract