Objective The medication-overuse headache (MOH) prevalence has not been investigated in a general Japanese population. We performed questionnaire-based survey and revealed MOH prevalence and its characteristics. We also performed clustering to obtain insight for MOH subgrouping. Methods In this cross-sectional study, the 15–64-year-old population was investigated in Itoigawa during their COVID-19 vaccination under the national policy. MOH was defined as ≥ 15 days/month plus self-report of use of pain medications ≥ 10 or 15 days/month in the last 3 months. Ward method and k-means + + were used to perform clustering MOH patients. Results Among 5865 valid responses, MOH prevalence was 2.32%. MOH was common among females and the middle-aged. Combination-analgesic is the most overused as 50%. MOH had aggravation by routine physical activity, moderate or severe pain, and migraine-like, compared to non-MOH. The 136 MOH patients could be grouped into 3 clusters. Age and frequency of acute medication use were essential factors for clustering. Conclusions This is the first study of MOH prevalence in Japan. Most MOH characteristics were similar to previous reports worldwide. Public awareness of proper headache treatment knowledge is still needed. Clustering results may be important for subtype grouping from a social perspective apart from existing clinical subtypes.
Objective: We prospectively performed the Itoigawa Headache Awareness Campaign from August 2021 to June 2022, with two main interventions, and evaluated its effectiveness.Background: Headache is a common public health problem, but its burden could be reduced by raising awareness about headache and the appropriate use of acute and prophylactic medication. However, few studies on raising headache awareness in the general public have been reported. Methods:The target group was the general public aged 15-64. We performed two main interventions synergistically supported by other small interventions. Intervention 1 included leaflet distribution and a paper-based questionnaire about headache during COVID-19 vaccination, and intervention 2 included on-demand e-learning and online survey through schools. In these interventions, we emphasize the six important topics for the general public that were described in the Clinical Practice Guideline for Headache Disorders 2021. Each response among the two interventions' cohorts was collected on pre and post occasions. The awareness of the six topics before and after the campaign was evaluated. Results: We obtained 4016 valid responses from 6382 individuals who underwent vaccination in intervention 1 and 2577 from 594 students and 1983 parents in intervention 2; thus, 6593 of 20,458 (32.2%) of the overall working-age population in Itoigawa city experienced these interventions. The percentage of individuals' aware of the six topics significantly increased after the two main interventions ranging from 6.6% (39/594)-40.0% (1606/4016) to 64.1% (381/594)-92.6% (1836/1983) (p < 0.001, all). ME THODS Campaign procedureWe performed this headache awareness campaign prospectively
Background: The prevalence of headache disorders, migraine, chronic daily headache (CDH), and medication-overuse headache (MOH) among the elderly in Japan has not been sufficiently investigated. We performed a questionnaire-based survey and revealed 3-month headache prevalence and headaches’ characteristics. Methods: The population aged over 64 was investigated in Itoigawa during their third coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination. Migraine, MOH was defined as The International Classification of Headache Disorders Third edition. CDH was defined as a headache occurring at least 15 days per month. K-means++ were used to perform clustering. Results: Among 2858 valid responses, headache disorders, migraine, CDH, and MOH prevalence was 11.97%, 0.91%, 1.57%, and 0.70%, respectively. Combined-analgesic and non-opioid analgesic were widely used. Only one migraineur used prophylactic medication. We performed k-means++ to group the 332 MOH patients into four clusters. Cluster 1 seemed to have tension-type headache-like headache characteristics, cluster 2 seemed to have MOH-like headache characteristics, cluster 3 seemed to have severe headaches with comorbidities such as dyslipidemia, stroke, and depression, and cluster 4 seemed to have migraine-like headache characteristics with photophobia and phonophobia. Conclusions: This is the largest prevalence survey in the Japanese elderly. Headache disorders are still the elderly’s burden. Clustering suggested that severe headaches associated with some comorbidities may be unique to the elderly.
Medication overuse headache (MOH) usually resolves after the overuse is stopped and starting prophylactic medications. However, it can be challenging to prescribe common prophylactic medications when patients have a history of side effects. As an alternative therapy, traditional Japanese herbal kampo medicine can be used. We herein report a case of a MOH woman with a history of side effects by such common prophylactic medications. A 50-year-old woman presented with a severe migraine attack. She had suffered from migraines for 10 years. She had taken loxoprofen and sumatriptan every day for over eight years. As prophylactic medications, lomerizine, valproic acid, and amitriptyline had been prescribed in the past, but they were discontinued due to side effects. Therefore, she could continue only propranolol as prophylactic medication. She had severe pulsatile headaches and nausea every day. We diagnosed triptan-and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-overuse headache (the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition code 8.2.2 and 8.2.3.2) and chronic migraine (code 1.3). She was admitted and stopped loxoprofen and sumatriptan. We prescribed three types of Japanese herbal kampo medicines -kakkonto (TJ-1), goreisan (TJ-17), and goshuyuto (TJ-31). Her headache was relieved on day 5, and she was discharged on day 7. In the 40 days after discharge, she had only three times mild headaches with a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 2/10. She did not need any triptans nor anti-inflammatory drugs. We herein presented the MOH woman who was successfully treated using three types of kampo medicine. We should pay attention to their side effects, but kampo medicine may be useful for MOH treatment as acute and prophylactic medications for primary headaches.
Introduction A chronic daily headache (CDH) comprises a group of headaches occurring at least 15 days per month for three or more consecutive months. We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of the hybrid treatment strategy for CDH using Kampo medicine combined with Western medication. Methods We retrospectively investigated 43 consecutive first-visit CDH patients. In addition to Western acute and prophylactic medications, we prescribed three types of Kampo medicines: goreisan , goshuyuto , and kakkonto depending on the patients’ symptoms. Headache impact test-6 (HIT-6), monthly headache days (MHD), monthly migraine days (MMD), and monthly acute medication intake days (AMD) before, 1- and 3-months after starting the hybrid medications were assessed as outcomes. Results Thirty-six women and seven men were included. The median age was 51 years old. Nine were chronic migraine (CM), 22 were episodic migraine and tension-type headaches (EM+TTH), and 12 were chronic TTH. Twenty-seven patients also had medication overuse headaches (MOH). The medians of HIT-6 before, one and three months after treatment were 63, 48, and 40, respectively. Those of MHD were 20, 5, and 2. Those of MMD were 2, 0, and 0. Those of AMD were 15, 0, and 0. Significant reductions in HIT-6, MDH, MMD, and AMD were observed one and three months after starting Kampo treatment. Similar trends were observed in the EM+TTH and MOH patients as subgroup analyses. Conclusion The hybrid medication strategy of Kampo and Western medicines for CDH is safe and effective in terms of both acute and prophylactic medications with rapid efficacy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.