SummaryBackgroundVonoprazan is a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker which may provide clinical benefit in acid‐related disorders.AimTo verify the non‐inferiority of vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis (EE), and to establish its long‐term safety and efficacy as maintenance therapy.MethodsIn this multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group comparison study, patients with endoscopically confirmed EE (LA Classification Grades A–D) were randomly allocated to receive vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily after breakfast. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with healed EE confirmed by endoscopy up to week 8. In addition, subjects who achieved healed EE in the comparison study were re‐randomised into a long‐term study to investigate the safety and efficacy of vonoprazan 10 or 20 mg as maintenance therapy for 52 weeks.ResultsOf the 409 eligible subjects randomised, 401 completed the comparison study, and 305 entered the long‐term maintenance study. The proportion of patients with healed EE up to week 8 was 99.0% for vonoprazan (203/205) and 95.5% for lansoprazole (190/199), thus verifying the non‐inferiority of vonoprazan (P < 0.0001). Vonoprazan was also effective in patients with more severe EE (LA Classification Grades C/D) and CYP2C19 extensive metabolisers. In the long‐term maintenance study, there were few recurrences (<10%) of EE in patients treated with vonoprazan 10 or 20 mg. Overall, vonoprazan was well‐tolerated.ConclusionsThe non‐inferiority of vonoprazan to lansoprazole in EE was verified in the comparison study, and vonoprazan was well‐tolerated and effective during the long‐term maintenance study.

SummaryBackgroundThe potassium‐competitive acid blocker vonoprazan (VPZ) has potent acid‐inhibitory effects and may offer clinical advantages over conventional therapy for acid‐related disorders.AimTo investigate the efficacy and safety of VPZ in patients with erosive oesophagitis (EO).MethodsIn this multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group, dose‐ranging study, patients ≥20 years with endoscopically confirmed EO [Los Angeles (LA) grades A−D] received VPZ 5, 10, 20 or 40 mg, or lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg once daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of healed EO subjects as shown by endoscopy at week 4.ResultsA total of 732 subjects received VPZ or LPZ. The proportion of healed EO subjects at week 4 was 92.3%, 92.5%, 94.4%, 97.0% and 93.2%, respectively, with VPZ 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg and LPZ 30 mg. All VPZ doses were non‐inferior to LPZ when adjusted for baseline LA grades A/B and C/D. Among those with LA grades C/D, the proportions of healed EO subjects were 87.3%, 86.4%, 100%, 96.0% and 87.0%, respectively, with VPZ 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg and LPZ 30 mg. The incidence of adverse events was similar across the groups.ConclusionsVonoprazan was effective and non‐inferior to LPZ in healing EO. VPZ 20 mg or higher was highly efficacious for severe EO (LA grades C/D). VPZ was associated with no safety concern during this 8‐week study, while there was a dose‐dependent increase in serum gastrin. Once‐daily VPZ 20 mg is the recommended clinical dose for treating EO.

AIMTo compare vonoprazan 10 and 20 mg vs lansoprazole 15 mg as maintenance therapy in healed erosive esophagitis (EE).METHODSA total of 607 patients aged ≥ 20 years, with endoscopically-confirmed healed EE following 8 wk of treatment with vonoprazan 20 mg once daily, were randomized 1:1:1 to receive lansoprazole 15 mg (n = 201), vonoprazan 10 mg (n = 202), or vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 204), once daily. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of endoscopically-confirmed EE recurrence during a 24-wk maintenance period. The secondary endpoint was the EE recurrence rate at Week 12 during maintenance treatment. Additional efficacy endpoints included the incidence of heartburn and acid reflux, and the EE healing rate 4 wk after the initiation of maintenance treatment. Safety endpoints comprised adverse events (AEs), vital signs, electrocardiogram findings, clinical laboratory results, serum gastrin and pepsinogen I/II levels, and gastric mucosa histopathology results.RESULTSRates of EE recurrence during the 24-wk maintenance period were 16.8%, 5.1%, and 2.0% with lansoprazole 15 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg, respectively. Vonoprazan was shown to be non-inferior to lansoprazole 15 mg (P < 0.0001 for both doses). In a post-hoc analysis, EE recurrence at Week 24 was significantly reduced with vonoprazan at both the 10 mg and the 20 mg dose vs lansoprazole 15 mg (5.1% vs 16.8%, P = 0.0002, and 2.0% vs 16.8%, P < 0.0001, respectively); by contrast, the EE recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two doses of vonoprazan (P = 0.1090). The safety profiles of vonoprazan 10 and 20 mg were similar to that of lansoprazole 15 mg in patients with healed EE. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 11.4%, 10.4%, and 10.3% of patients in the lansoprazole 15 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg arms, respectively.CONCLUSIONOur findings confirm the non-inferiority of vonoprazan 10 and 20 mg to lansoprazole 15 mg as maintenance therapy for patients with healed EE.

BackgroundFor many patients, current treatments do not adequately resolve heartburn in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).ObjectiveTo compare vonoprazan and placebo with respect to the frequency and severity of heartburn in patients with NERD.MethodsThis Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study included patients in Japan aged ≥20 years with Grade N or M NERD and recurrent acid reflux symptoms. Patients were blinded and randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo or vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of days without heartburn measured by patient scores during the 4-week treatment period.ResultsEight hundred twenty-seven patients were randomized (placebo: n = 278, vonoprazan 10 mg: n = 278, and vonoprazan 20 mg: n = 271). Median proportion of days without heartburn was 7.4% (placebo), 10.3% (vonoprazan 10 mg), and 12.0% (vonoprazan 20 mg). Proportion of days without heartburn was not statistically significant between the vonoprazan and placebo groups (P = 0.2310 [10 mg] and P = 0.0504 [20 mg]). Mean severity of heartburn was significantly higher with placebo (median score = 1.070) than with vonoprazan 10 mg (median score = 0.990; P = 0.0440) and 20 mg (median score = 0.960; P = 0.0139). Patients whose symptoms improved at Week 2 experienced significantly increased proportion of days without heartburn and reduced mean severity of heartburn at Week 4 with vonoprazan compared with placebo (proportion of days without heartburn: P = 0.0004 [10 mg] and P = 0.0001 [20 mg] and mean severity: P < 0.0001 [10 mg] and P < 0.0001 [20 mg]). A significant difference in median proportion of days without heartburn was observed for vonoprazan 20 mg compared with placebo in patients with Grade M NERD. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 32.7% (placebo), 27.7% (vonoprazan 10 mg), and 28.0% (vonoprazan 20 mg).ConclusionsVonoprazan at doses of 10 mg and 20 mg are not superior to placebo with respect to proportion of days without heartburn, whereas the mean severity of heartburn is lower with vonoprazan compared with placebo in patients with NERD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01474369.

Introduction: This phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of brigatinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC refractory to alectinib or other ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).Methods: This single-arm, multicenter, open-label study in Japanese patients consisted of a safety lead-in followed by an expansion stage in patients refractory to ALK TKI or those naive for ALK TKI. Patients received brigatinib 180 mg once daily with 7-day lead-in at 90 mg once daily. Primary end point was independent review committee (IRC)assessed confirmed objective response rate per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results:We report the results of the lead-in and expansion in the patients refractory to ALK TKI. Of 72 patients enrolled, 47 had alectinib as most recent ALK TKI (with or without previous crizotinib). At analysis cutoff, 14 of the 47 remained on brigatinib (median follow-up: 12.4 mo). In the alectinib-refractory population, IRC-assessed confirmed objective response rate was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21%-49%) with median duration of response of 11.8 months (95% CI: 5.5-16.4). Disease control rate was 79% (95% CI: 64%-89%). Median IRCassessed progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI: 3.7-9.3). Two of eight patients with measurable brain lesions at baseline had confirmed intracranial partial response. Brigatinib has been found to have antitumor activity in patients with G1202R, I1171N, V1180L, and L1196M secondary mutations. The safety profile in Japanese patients was consistent with that in previous reports in broader populations.Conclusions: Brigatinib has been found to have clinically meaningful efficacy in Japanese patients with ALKþ NSCLC refractory to alectinib (with or without previous crizotinib).