Cognitive impairments due to traumatic brain injury (TBI) are substantial sources of morbidity for affected individuals, their family members, and society. Disturbances of attention, memory, and executive functioning are the most common neurocognitive consequences of TBI at all levels of severity. Disturbances of attention and memory are particularly problematic, as disruption of these relatively basic cognitive functions may cause or exacerbate additional disturbances in executive function, communication, and other relatively more complex cognitive functions. Because of the high rate of other physical, neurologic, and psychiatric syndromes following TBI, a thorough neuropsychiatric assessment of the patient is a prerequisite to the prescription of any treatment for impaired cognition. Psychostimulants and other dopaminergically active agents (eg, methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, amantadine, levodopa/carbidopa, bromocriptine) may modestly improve arousal and speed of information processing, reduce distractibility, and improve some aspects of executive function. Cautious dosing (start-low and go-slow), frequent standardized assessment of effects and side effects, and monitoring for drug-drug interactions are recommended. Cognitive rehabilitation is useful for the treatment of memory impairments following TBI. Cognitive rehabilitation may also be useful for the treatment of impaired attention, interpersonal communication skills, and executive function following TBI. This form of treatment is most useful for patients with mild to moderate cognitive impairments, and may be particularly useful for those who are still relatively functionally independent and motivated to engage in and rehearse these strategies. Psychotherapy (eg, supportive, individual, cognitive-behavioral, group, and family) is an important component of treatment. For patients with medication- and rehabilitation-refractory cognitive impairments, psychotherapy may be needed to assist both patients and families with adjustment to permanent disability.

Psychosis arises with considerable frequency in a number of neurologic conditions. The treatment of such patients is often challenging, as many of the treatments for psychosis pose some risk of worsening the underlying neurologic condition. Although psychosis may emerge in the context of any neurologic condition that sufficiently disrupts the functioning of or connections between limbic, paralimbic, frontal, subcortical areas mediating complex sensory perception, interpretation, and thought or language organization, secondary psychoses are most often encountered in patients with Alzheimer's disease (Parkinson's disease receives dopaminomimetic therapies) and epilepsy. Psychosis, and particularly delusions and visual hallucinations, may arise in Alzheimer's disease. Based on the available literature, the first-line therapy for this problem is risperidone 0.5 to 3 mg per day. If this treatment proves unsuccessful, low-dose haloperidol or olanzapine should be considered next. If these treatments prove unsuccessful, quetiapine should then be considered. Finally, clozapine may be useful for treatment-refractory psychosis due to Alzheimer's disease, but due caution is warranted given its considerable anticholinergic properties and potential for worsening cognition in these patients. Although disease-emergent psychosis (paranoid delusions and visual hallucinations) may develop in patients with Parkinson's disease, psychosis due to dopaminomimetic therapy is much more common. When such symptoms develop, the accepted first step is to taper anti-parkinsonian medications were possible. Anticholinergic medications, amantadine, selegiline, and dopamine receptor agonists should be reduced or discontinued, provided that the patient can tolerate changes in motor symptoms attendant to such reductions. When these reductions are not feasible or fail to improve treatment-emergent psychosis, low-dose quetiapine or clozapine may be useful. The greatest body of evidence supports the effectiveness of these treatments and their relative lack of adverse effects on motor function. When psychosis develops in the context of epilepsy, the generally accepted first step is to maximize anticonvulsant therapy in an effort to reduce the possible contribution of electrophysiologic disturbances in the described areas to psychotic symptoms. When interictal psychosis persists despite such adjustments, initiation with low-dose atypical antipsychotics carries the least risk of lowering seizure threshold and should be considered.