BackgroundThe diagnosis of myocarditis is challenging due to its varying clinical presentation. Since myocarditis can be associated with significant 5-year mortality, and postmortem data show myocarditis in almost 10% of all adults suffering sudden cardiac death, individual risk stratification for patients with suspected myocarditis is of great clinical interest. We sought to demonstrate that patients with clinically suspected myocarditis and a normal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) according to our definition have a good prognosis, independent of their clinical symptoms and other findings.MethodsProspective clinical long-term follow-up of consecutive patients undergoing CMR for work-up of clinically suspected myocarditis at our institution in 2007-2008.ResultsFollow-up was available for n = 405 patients (all-comers, 54.8% inpatients, 38% outpatient referrals from cardiologists). Median follow-up time was 1591 days. CMR diagnosis was “myocarditis” in 28.8%, “normal” in 55.6% and “other pathology” in 15.6%. Normal CMR was defined as normal left ventricular (LV) volumes and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) in the absence of late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE). The overall mortality was 3.2%. There were seven cardiac deaths during follow-up, in addition one aborted SCD and two patients had appropriate internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks – all of these occurred in patients with abnormal CMR. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test showed significant difference for major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, sudden cardiac death (SCD), ICD discharge, aborted SCD) between patients with normal and abnormal CMR (p = 0.0003).ConclusionIn our unselected population of consecutive patients referred for CMR work-up of clinically suspected myocarditis, patients with normal CMR have a good prognosis independent of their clinical symptoms and other findings.

BackgroundThe diagnostic performance of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with arrhythmias presenting for work-up of suspected or known CAD is largely unknown, since most CMR studies currently available exclude arrhythmic patients from analysis fearing gating problems, or other artifacts will impair image quality. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of adenosine stress CMR for detection of significant coronary stenosis in patients with arrhythmia presenting for 1) work-up of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), or 2) work-up of ischemia in known CAD.MethodsPatients with arrhythmia referred for work-up of suspected CAD or work-up of ischemia in known CAD undergoing adenosine stress CMR were included if they had coronary angiography within four weeks of CMR.ResultsOne hundred fifty-nine patients were included (n = 64 atrial fibrillation, n = 87 frequent ventricular extrasystoles, n = 8 frequent supraventricular extrasystoles). Of these, n = 72 had suspected CAD, and n = 87 had known CAD. Diagnostic accuracy of the adenosine stress CMR for detection of significant CAD was 73 % for the entire population (sensitivity 72 %, specificity 76 %). Diagnostic accuracy was 75 % (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 74 %) in patients with suspected CAD, and 74 % (sensitivity 71 %, specificity 79 %) in the group with known CAD. For different types of arrhythmia, diagnostic accuracy of CMR was 70 % in the atrial fibrillation group, and 79 % in patients with ventricular extrasystoles. On a per coronary territory analysis, diagnostic accuracy of CMR was 77 % for stenosis of the left and 82 % for stenosis of the right coronary artery.ConclusionThe present data demonstrates good diagnostic performance of adenosine stress CMR for detection of significant coronary stenosis in patients with arrhythmia presenting for work-up of suspected CAD, or work-up of ischemia in known CAD. This holds true for a per patient, as well as for a per coronary territory analysis.

No abstract

Over the past years, the importance of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in atrial fibrillation (AF) pathophysiology has been recognised. Lately, the role of aldosterone in AF pathophysiology and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonism in "upstream" AF treatment is discussed. Hypothesising that selective MR antagonism might also influence atrial ion currents (L-type calcium current [I (Ca,L)], transient outward potassium current [I (to)], sustained outward potassium current [I (sus)]) and their tachycardia-induced remodelling, the effects of an eplerenone treatment were studied in a rabbit model. Six groups each with four animals were built. Animals of the control group received atrial pacing leads, but in contrast to the pacing groups, no atrial tachypacing (600 per minute for 24 and 120 h immediately before heart removal) was applied. Animals of the eplerenone groups were instrumented/paced as the corresponding control/pacing groups, but were additionally treated with eplerenone (7 days before heart removal). Atrial tachypacing was associated with a reduction of I (Ca,L). I (to) was decreased after 24 h of tachypacing, but returned to control values after 120 h. In the absence of rapid atrial pacing, MR antagonism reduced I (Ca,L) to a similar extent as 120 h of tachypacing alone. Based on this lower "take-off level", I (Ca,L) was not further decreased by high-rate pacing. I (to) and its expected tachycardia-induced alterations were not influenced by MR antagonism. In our experiments, selective MR antagonism influenced atrial I (Ca,L) and its tachycardia-induced alterations. As changes of I (Ca,L) are closely linked with atrial calcium signalling, the relevance of these alterations in AF pathophysiology and, accordingly, AF treatment is likely and has to be further evaluated.

Abstract. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in man. Over the past years, importance of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in AF pathophysiology has been recognized. Lately, the role of aldosterone in AF pathophysiology and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonism in "upstream" AF treatment is discussed with special regards concerning the effects on AF-induced structural remodeling. However, there is more and more evidence that MR antagonism also influences atrial electrophysiology and, respectively, AF-induced electrical remodeling, whereas the molecular mechanisms are almost unknown.The aim of this mini-review is to give an overview about the role of aldosterone in AF pathophysiology in principle and to summarize current available data concerning affection of cardiac ion channels by aldosterone and MR antagonism. Finally, as modulation of oxidative stress is discussed as one main therapy principle of "upstream" treatment of AF, potential mechanisms how modulation of oxidative stress by aldosterone and accordingly MR antagonism might alter atrial ion currents are delineated.Summarized, publications concerning potential mechanisms of aldosterone-and MR antagonismmodulated cardiac ion channels in various experimental settings are almost exclusively limited to the ventricular level and, partly, they are also contradictorily. Translation of these data to the atria is problematic because atrial and ventricular electrophysiology exhibit remarkable differences. It can be concluded that further research on the "atrial level" is needed in order to clarify the potential impact of the affection of atrial ion channels by aldosterone and accordingly MR antagonism in "upstream" therapy of AF.