No abstract

No abstract

Context:Regional anesthesia has emerged as one of the preferred and convenient modes for intra- and post-operative management owing to its advantage of not interfering with the metabolic functions, better tolerability, and decrease in reflex activity. In recent years, ropivacaine has increasingly replaced bupivacaine as a preferred local anesthetic because of its similar analgesic properties, lesser motor blockade, and decreased propensity of cardiotoxicity. Neuraxial adjuvant such as clonidine used in epidural anesthesia offers advantage by augmenting the local anesthetic effect and reducing the anesthetic and analgesic requirement.Aims and Objectives:Comparison of onset, duration of sensory and motor block, and any adverse effects between 0.5% ropivacaine with normal saline versus 0.5% ropivacaine with clonidine (75 μg/kg).Materials and Methods:This prospective randomized study was carried out in 50 patients (25 in each group) of American Society of Anesthesiologist Grade 1 and 2 scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy under epidural block. Group-1 (ropivacaine-clonidine [RC]): Epidural ropivacaine 20 ml (0.5%) with 0.75 μg/kg clonidine. Group-2 (ropivacaine [R]): Epidural ropivacaine 20 ml (0.5%) with normal saline. Onset, duration of sensory-motor block, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate were recorded.Statistical Analysis:The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 15.0. Chi-square test, ANOVA, Student's t-test, and paired t-test were used.Results:Groups were comparable with regard to demographic data and hemodynamic stability. Onset of sensory and motor blockade was faster in RC group as compared to R group. Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly prolonged in RC group. No potential side effect was seen in either group.Conclusion:On account of faster onset, hemodynamic stability, and prolonged postoperative analgesia, ropivacaine with clonidine is a better option than ropivacaine alone.

Introduction:Postoperative period after panhysterectomy is very painful as there is too much tissue handling. In the practice of regional anesthesia neuraxial, opioids have been used extensively as an adjuvant to bupivacaine to enhance the potency and duration of sensory and motor block produced by bupivacaine with satisfactory results. However, delayed respiratory depression by opioids has prompted further research to develop nonopioid analgesics. This study was undertaken to assess the degree of sensory and motor block and postoperative analgesia provided by low dose 50 μg intrathecal clonidine admixed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine as compared to bupivacaine alone in patients undergoing a total abdominal hysterectomy.Materials and Methods:Hundred adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologist Class 1 and 2 were randomly allocated to Group A and Group B. Group A patients received 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 50 μg clonidine intrathecally. Group B patients received 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with normal saline.Observation and Results:The mean duration of motor block was significantly higher in Group A (270.80± 66.0 min) as compared to Group B (184.60 ± 72.03 min), with statistically significant difference. There was also statistically significant difference in the duration of sensory block between Group A (290.20 ± 80.27 min) and Group B (190.83 ± 86.90 min). The duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in Group A as compared to Group B (541.06 ± 130.64 min and 252.80 ± 84.10 min respectively).Conclusion:Addition of intrathecal clonidine 50 μg to bupivacaine (15 mg, 0.5%) prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia, thus produces an effective spinal anesthesia and good postoperative analgesia for longer duration and reduced postoperative analgesic requirement.