No abstract

We hypothesized that myocardial loading can be increased when extracorporeal pulse flow occurs during systole, and that this may adversely affect myocardial working conditions in heart failure patients supported by extracorporeal life support (ECLS). This study was designed to compare myocardial loading and myocardial oxygen consumption/supply balance between nonpulsatile ECLS and asynchronized pulsatile ECLS in a myocardial stunning model. Thirteen, 23-42 kg dogs were allotted to a nonpulsatile group and an asynchronous pulsatile group. Coronary sinus lactate level, mixed venous oxygen consumption (MvO2), and left anterior descending coronary artery flow were measured. The real-time pressure of the left ventricle and the ascending aorta was monitored, and the lowest left ventricular pressure and tension time index were calculated. Our results showed that the lactate level and the lowest left ventricular pressure were lower in the pulsatile group than in the nonpulsatile group at 30 minutes after ECLS was applicated (p < 0.05, respectively). Tension time index in the pulsatile ECLS group was substantially lower than in the nonpulsatile group. Left anterior descending coronary flow did not show significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion, asynchronous pulsatile ECLS may also be superior to nonpulsatile ECLS in myocardial volume unloading and oxygen consumption/supply balance.

BackgroundCounter-pulsation control (CPC) by ventricular assist devices (VADs) is believed to reduce cardiac load and increase coronary perfusion. However, patients with VADs have a higher risk of arrhythmia, which may cause the CPC to fail. Consequently, CPC has not been applied by VADs in clinical practice. The phase-locked loop (PLL) algorithm for CPC is readily implemented in VADs; however, it requires a normal, consistent heartbeat for adequate performance. When an arrhythmia occurs, the algorithm maintains a constant pumping rate despite the unstable heartbeat. Therefore, to apply the PLL algorithm to CPC, the hemodynamic effects of abnormal heartbeats must be analyzed.ObjectivesThis study sought to predict the hemodynamic effects in patients undergoing CPC using VADs, based on electrocardiogram (ECG) data, including a wide range of heart rate (HR) changes caused by premature ventricular contraction (PVC) or other reasons.MethodsA four-element Windkessel hemodynamic model was used to reproduce the patient’s aortic blood pressure in this study. ECG data from 15 patients with severe congestive heart failure were used to assess the effect of the CPC on the patients’ hemodynamic state. The input and output flow characteristics of the pulsatile VAD (LibraHeart I, Cervika, Korea) were measured using an ultrasound blood flow meter (TS410, Transonic, USA), with the aortic pressure maintained at 80–120 mmHg. All other patient conditions were also reproduced.ResultsIn patients with PVCs or normal heartbeats, CPC controlled by a VAD reduced the cardiac load by 20 and 40%, respectively. When the HR was greater for other reasons, such as sinus tachycardia, simultaneous ejection from the heart and VAD was observed; however, the cardiac load was not increased by rapid cardiac contractions resulting from decreased left ventricle volume. These data suggest that the PLL algorithm reduces the cardiac load and maintains consistent hemodynamic changes.

No abstract