The presence and benefit of a radiation therapy-associated immune reaction is of great interest as the overall interest in cancer immunotherapy expands. The pathological assessment of irradiated tumors rarely demonstrates consistent immune or inflammatory response. More recent information, primarily associated with the "abscopal effect", suggests a subtle radiation-based systemic immune response may be more common and have more therapeutic potential than previously believed. However, to be of consistent value, the immune stimulatory potential of radiation therapy (RT) will clearly need to be supported by combination with other immunotherapy efforts. In this study, using a spontaneous canine oral melanoma model, we have assessed the efficacy and tumor immunopathology of two nanotechnology-based immune adjuvants combined with RT. The immune adjuvants were administered intratumorally, in an approach termed "in situ vaccination", that puts immunostimulatory reagents into a recognized tumor and utilizes the endogenous antigens in the tumor as the antigens in the antigen/adjuvant combination that constitutes a vaccine. The radiation treatment consisted of a local 6 × 6 Gy tumor regimen given over a 12 day period. The immune adjuvants were a plant-based virus-like nanoparticle (VLP) and a 110 nm diameter magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (mNPH) that was activated with an alternating magnetic field (AMF) to produce moderate heat (43 °C/60 min). The RT was used alone or combined with one or both adjuvants. The VLP (4 × 200 μg) and mNPH (2 × 7.5 mg/gram tumor) were delivered intratumorally respectively during the RT regimen. All patients received a diagnostic biopsy and CT-based 3-D radiation treatment plan prior to initiating therapy. Patients were assessed clinically 14-21 days post-treatment, monthly for 3 months following treatment, and bimonthly, thereafter. Immunohistopathologic assessment of the tumors was performed before and 14-21 days following treatment. Results suggest that addition of VLPs and/or mNPH to a hypofractionated radiation regimen increases the immune cell infiltration in the tumor, extends the tumor control interval, and has important systemic therapeutic potential.
Previous molecular genetic studies on HeLa cell (a cervical cancer cell line) derived non-tumorigenic and tumorigenic hybrids have localized a tumor suppressor gene to the long arm of chromosome 11. Analysis of cervical cancer cell lines using chromosome 11 specific probes showed deletion and translocation of 11q13 sequences in five out of eight cell lines. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), using 11q13 specific probes, has shown interstitial deletion of 11q13 sequences in the HeLa cells. In order to determine whether 11q13 deletions occur in primary cervical tumors, we analysed 36 tumors using 20 different microsatellite and RFLP markers. Semi automated fluorescein based allelotyping was performed to identify loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in tumors. The results showed allelic loss in 17 (47%) tumors. Three different regions of loss, one near MEN1, the second near D11S913, and the third near INT2 locus were observed. The smallest region of deletion overlap at the D11S913 locus was localized to a 300 Kb distance between D11S4908 and D11S5023. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), using 11q13 specific cosmid and BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) probes, confirmed allelic deletion in the tumors. PCR analysis further identified homozygous deletion of 11q13 sequences in a primary tumor, in HeLa cells and in two HeLa cell derived tumorigenic hybrid cell lines. The homozygous deletion in the cell lines was mapped to a 5.7 kb sequence of 11q13. We hypothesize therefore that a putative cervical cancer tumor suppressor gene exists within the 300 kb of chromosome 11q13.
Background: Dog ear, a characteristic bunching up of excess tissue formed during wound closure, is a common unsightly problem in cutaneous surgery. It may present as a cosmetic concern or a source of physical discomfort. Several management techniques have been reported, but it is unclear which approach is the most effective or whether outcomes vary with surgical situations. This report assesses the best practices for dog ear management. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed. All relevant articles written in English and involving human subjects were included. Results: There were 2028 potentially relevant articles, but only 36 articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles were published in multispecialty journals. They included 23 techniques or case report articles, 6 retrospective and prospective studies, but no clinical trial or randomized control trial. Ten major techniques were identified in the literature. No single technique was proved to be superior in the literature. There was no recommended algorithm in the literature. Conclusions: Despite there being no single recommended technique to manage dog ear deformities, there is ample evidence to suggest surgeons avoid a pre-planned elliptical design, use a proper skin-conserving design for excision, and carry out a meticulous suture closure as the first steps to prevent dog ears. We discuss the indications for each of the ten techniques and propose an algorithm for dog ear management. Until further research is performed, multispecialty cutaneous surgeons should familiarize themselves with the discussed techniques to provide patients with the best functional and aesthetic results.
Introduction and importance: Large cutaneous defects may result from excision of skin malignancies. Typically, skin grafting is used to manage such defects, but the final result may be compromised by inadequate take and poor cosmesis. Accordingly, transposition flaps may be indicated. Case Presentation and clinical discussion: A 93-year-old female presented with a painful, necrotic 12 cm × 12 cm Squamous Cell Cancer of left upper back. She underwent wide excision followed by a rhomboid transposition fasciocutaneous flap. The flap was easily designed, quickly executed, and did not require any special instruments. The overall result was a good cosmetic outcome with no complications. Conclusion Our case outlines successful use of rhomboid flap instead of a more complicated option to reconstruct a very large cutaneous defect. The flap healed with excellent contour, texture, thickness, and color match.
Summary: Resection of large cutaneous malignancies may result in substantial skin defects. Often, skin grafting is a first-line option for reconstruction of such defects but may be limited by poor cosmetic outcomes and incomplete graft acceptance. Accordingly, skin flaps, tissue rearrangement techniques, and more complex procedures may be needed. This case report presents the successful use of a rhomboid flap for reconstruction of a 20 × 19 cm2-sized trunk skin defect left after a squamous cell cancer resection. The flap was quickly and easily fashioned, did not require any special instruments, and resulted in a good cosmetic outcome. There were no major wound complications despite postoperative radiation therapy. At 1-year follow-up, the flap healed completely with excellent contour, texture, thickness, color match, and complete patient satisfaction. In the past, rhomboid flaps have been used for small defects. This case is a unique example of a versatile and successful rhomboid flap reconstruction of an extremely large defect, instead of a more complicated reconstructive option.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.