Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection during pregnancy could damage the placenta, but data on neonates born to COVID-19-positive mothers is scarce. In this case series, we aim to describe clinical characteristics, transmission rate and outcomes at 3 months of age among neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 diagnosed near the time of delivery. Methods: Prospective, multicenter case series from Suriname. We collected clinical data of neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 infection between June and August 2021. COVID-19 swabs were taken within 5 days and 2 weeks after birth. Follow-up took place at 3 months. Results: We enrolled 18 neonates. However, 18/18 (100%) mothers were infected in the third trimester and 10/18 (55.6%) had severe COVID-19 infection requiring ICU admission and 2/10 (20%) died. In total 16/18 (77.8%) neonates were born after cesarean section and 13/18 (72.2%) were born preterm (median 35 weeks, Interquartile range 32 + 4–38 + 0). Neonatal intensive care unit admission was needed in 7/18 (38.9%) neonates. Respiratory symptoms occurred in 12/18 (66.7%), 5/18 (27.8%) were suspected of early-onset sepsis and 1/18(5.6%) of late-onset sepsis. One preterm neonate developed necrotizing enterocolitis. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive in 1/18 (5.5%) neonates within 5 days of life and in 0/11 (0%) neonates after 2 weeks. Follow-up showed mild neurodevelopmental delay in 2/14 (14.3%) patients. Conclusion: We describe a high proportion of severely ill mothers due to COVID-19 infection with subsequent cesarean delivery and prematurity. Accounting for gestational age at birth, the neonatal clinical course and findings at follow-up appeared similar to neonates born to COVID-19-negative mothers. Maternal vaccination is recommended to prevent neonatal risks associated with prematurity and cesarean delivery.

We describe three clinical cases of Surinamese children with rhabdomyolysis with diverse clinical presentation and course. The first patient had rhabdomyolysis because of toxins caused by multiple beestings and developed acute kidney injury. The other two patients had rhabdomyolysis following acute infection with chikungunya and influenza A/H1N1 virus. These cases emphasize that the diverse etiology of rhabdomyolysis should be considered in children in tropical settings.

Venomous snakebites regularly occur in Suriname, a middle-income country located on the north coast of South America. Officially reported data on incidence and mortality are lacking. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether the use of our national snakebite protocol with selective administration of anti-snake venom (ASV) in patients with signs of snakebite envenoming improved clinical outcome as measured by mortality and length of stay (LOS) in the hospital. Medical records of all patients admitted at the Academic Hospital Paramaribo from 2013 to 2015, before and after the introduction of the protocol, with signs of snakebite envenoming, were reviewed for demographics, snakebite characteristics, mortality, length of hospital stay, administration of ASV, and occurrence of complications. Secondary outcome measures were the development of late complications due to a snakebite. Sixty-eight and 76 patients in 2013 and 2015, respectively, with venomous or potentially venomous snakebites were identified. One patient (1.5%) in 2013 and 29 patients (38.2%) in 2015 received ASV. In 2013 one patient died: deterioration of renal function occurred before protocolled ASV administration. No deaths were reported in 2015. There was no difference in the overall length of hospital stay between 2013 and 2015 or in the total number of late complications. In 2015, the mean LOS (±SD) for patients who did not receive ASV (n = 47) was significantly lower than that for patients who received ASV (n = 29), 2.15 ± 2.27 versus 5.31 ± 5.53 days, respectively (P = 0.001). The mean LOS (±SD) for patients who did not receive ASV in 2013 (n = 67) and 2015 (n = 47) was 4.06 ± 5.44 and 2.15 ± 2.27 days, respectively, which also differed significantly (P = 0.025). The protocolled evaluation of snakebite victims resulted in more patients being admitted to the intensive care unit and receiving ASV and a shorter length of hospital stay for the patients who did not receive ASV, and no difference in the occurrence of complications was observed in Suriname's largest hospital responsible for the acute care of snakebite victims.