Background Malnutrition in patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards is highly prevalent and represents a prognostic factor of worse outcomes. Previous evidence suggested the prognostic role of the nutritional status in patients affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aim to investigate the nutritional risk in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in an internal medicine ward and their clinical outcomes using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and parameters derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Methods Retrospective analysis of patients with COVID-19 aimed at exploring: 1) the prevalence of nutritional risk with NRS-2002 and BIA; 2) the relationship between NRS-2002, BIA parameters and selected outcomes: length of hospital stay (LOS); death and need of intensive care unit (ICU); prolonged LOS; and loss of appetite. Results Data of 90 patients were analyzed. Patients at nutritional risk were 92% with NRS-2002, with BIA-derived parameters: 88% by phase angle; 86% by body cell mass; 84% by fat-free mass and 84% by fat mass (p-value ≤0.001). In ROC analysis, NRS had the maximum sensitivity in predicting the risk of death and need of ICU and a prolonged hospitalization showing moderate-low specificity; phase angle showed a good predictive power in terms of AUC. NRS-2002 was significantly associated with LOS (β 12.62, SE 5.79). In a multivariate analysis, blood glucose level and the early warning score are independent predictors of death and need of ICU (OR 2.79, p ≤0.001; 1.59, p-0.029, respectively). Conclusion Present findings confirm the clinical utility of NRS-2002 to assess nutritional risk in patients with COVID-19 at hospital admission and in predicting LOS, and that bioimpedance does not seem to add further predictive value. An early detection of nutritional risk has to be systematically included in the management of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards.
Gabutti (2021) Comparing oscillometric and tonometric methods to assess pulse wave velocity: a population-based study,
Introduction: Increasing dialysate magnesium (D-Mg 2?) appears to be an intriguing strategy to obtain cardiovascular benefits in subjects with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis. To date, however, hemodialysis guidelines do not suggest to increase D-Mg 2? routinely set at 0.50 mmol/L. Methods: A randomized 4-week crossover study aimed at investigating the consequences of increasing D-Mg 2? from 0.50 to 0.75 mmol/L on arterial stiffness, hemodynamic profile, and endothelial function in subjects undergoing hemodialysis. The long-term effect of higher D-Mg 2? on mineral metabolism markers was investigated in a 6-month follow-up. Data were analyzed by linear mixed models for repeated measures. Results: Data of 39 patients were analyzed. Pulse wave velocity and pulse pressure significantly decreased on the higher D-Mg 2? compared with the standard one by-0.91 m/s (95% confidence interval-1.52 to-0.29; p = 0.01) and-9.61 mmHg (-18.89 to-0.33, p = 0.04), respectively. A significant reduction in systolic blood pressure of-12.96 mmHg (-24.71 to-1.22, p = 0.03) was also observed. No period or carryover effects were observed. During the long-term follow-up phase the higher D-Mg 2? significantly increased ionized and total serum Mg (respectively from 0.54 to 0.64 and from 0.84 to 1.07 mmol/L; mean percentage change from baseline to follow-up ? 21% and ? 27%; p B 0.001), while parathormone (PTH) decreased significantly (from 36.6 to 34.4 pmol/ L; % change-11%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Increasing dialysate magnesium improves vascular stiffness in subjects undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The present findings merit a larger trial to evaluate the Rosaria Del Giorno and Soraya Lavorato Hadjeres are joint first authors.
Previous experimental studies showed that increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) cholesterol shortens cardiac ventricular repolarization and the QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc). However, little is known about the epidemiological relationship between HDL and QTc. The potential antiarrhythmic effect of HDL cholesterol remains a speculative hypothesis. In this cross-sectional population based study in adults living in the Italian-speaking part of Switzerland, we aimed to explore the association between HDL cholesterol and the QTc interval in the general population. A total of 1202 subjects were screened. electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, measurements of lipid parameters and other laboratory tests were performed. QTc was corrected using Bazett’s (QTcBaz) and Framingham (QTcFram) formulas. HDL was categorized according to percentile distributions: <25th (HDL-1; ≤1.39 mmol/L); 25th–<50th (HDL-2; 1.40–1.69 mmol/L); 50th–<75th (HDL-3; 1.69–1.99 mmol/L); and ≥75th (HDL-4; ≥2.0 mmol/L). After exclusion procedures, data of 1085 subjects were analyzed. Compared with the HDL reference group (HDL-1), HDL-2 and HDL-3 were associated with a reduction of QTcBaz and QTcFram duration in crude (HDL-2, QTcBaz/QTcFram: β-11.306/–10.186, SE 4.625/4.016; p = 0.016/0.012; HDL-3, β-12.347/–12.048, SE 4.875/4.233, p = 0.012/<0.001) and adjusted (HDL-2: β-11.697/–10.908, SE 4.333/4.151, p < 0.001/0.010; HDL-3 β-11.786/–11.002, SE 4.719/4.521, p = 0.014/0.016) linear regression models in women. In adjusted logistic regression models higher HDL, were also associated with lower risk of prolonged QTcBaz/QTcFram (HDL-2: OR 0.16/0.17, CI 0.03–0.83/0.47–0.65; HDL-3: OR 0.10/0.14, CI 0.10–0.64/0.03–0.63) in women. Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed a non linear association (p < 0.001). The present findings indicate an epidemiological association between HDL cholesterol and QTc duration. To draw firm conclusions, further investigations in other populations and with a prospective cohort design are needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.