Purpose: The treatment of pathologic lesions in jaws either through conservative or radical approaches, frequently leads to a loss of teeth. As a result, patients will experience diminished masticatory and phonetic function as well as esthetic deficits. In this manuscript, we report multiple cases of successful implant rehabilitation after the conservative treatment of pathologic lesions in jaws utilizing allogeneic bone grafts and the installation of implant fixtures. Materials and Methods: In this study, we examined 8 patients with 8 different kinds of pathologic lesions in their jaws, who were treated with a conservative approach and rehabilitated with bone grafts and implant installations using internal dental implant type with tapered, sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched surfaces. Marginal bone loss was analyzed through radiograms, and the implant survival rates and graft outcome evaluations were recorded. Results: No significant difference was found in the mean marginal bone loss throughout the follow-up period. The survival rate of the implant and the success rate of graft were recorded as 100%. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that conservative surgical management for pathologic lesions based on the understanding of the pathologies can be helpful for successful oral rehabilitation. In bone grafting, it is necessary to determine an appropriate timing and method considering the risk of recurrence and the vascularity of the recipient site. For subsequent implant placement, selecting an implant system suitable for the site of placement and placing it within 3 to 6 months after bone grafting can help the long-term maintenance of the grafted bone and dental implant.

Objectives: While the reliability of immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar has been discussed, its significance is questionable. There have been no guidelines for case selection and surgical technique for successful treatment outcomes of immediate maxillary molar implants. Therefore, in this study, we classified alveolar bone height and socket morphology of the maxillary molar to establish guidelines for immediate implant placement.

Oroantral fistula (OAF) is the most common etiology for odontogenic maxillary sinusitis that can be caused by tooth extractions, failed maxillary sinus lifts, bone grafts, and poor positioning of dental implant fixtures. A 52-year-old man presented with an OAF and maxillary sinusitis after implant placement and bone grafting. The authors treated the patient with modified endoscopic sinus surgery to obtain OAF closure and provided dental implant placement procedures afterward. The authors also treated 8 other similar cases with favorable outcomes. In this study, the authors report the know-how of implant placement procedures in patients with OAF and maxillary sinusitis.