The article has been devoted to the consideration of problematic aspects of the legal regulation of the termination of the right to use housing. It has been found that the legal regulation of the termination of the right to use housing is carried out by the norms of housing and civil law. Special attention has been drawn to the fact that the Housing Code of Ukraine, despite the legislative changes made to it, does not correspond in content to modern social realities in the conditions of harmonization of the legislation of Ukraine with the law of the European Union. Despite this, it is still used in law enforcement, which often gives rise to numerous collisions and problematic situations. It has been established that the precedent practice of the Supreme Court, as the highest court in the judicial system of Ukraine, one of the tasks of which, according to the Law of Ukraine "On the Judicial System and the Status of Judges", is to ensure the stability and unity of judicial practice, as well as the uniform application of legal norms by courts of various specializations in the order and manner determined by the procedural law, in the researched sphere of relations is quite diverse. The necessity of completely updating the housing legislation of Ukraine and bringing it to modern realities has been proved. It has been established that until this issue is unambiguously and clearly settled by the domestic legislator, in eviction cases, everything will depend on the specific factual circumstances, taking into account the person in respect of whom the issue of termination of the right to use residential premises is being decided. Also the attention has been drawn to the fact that the Civil Code of Ukraine is a codified act of legislation adopted later in time, therefore in modern realities the temporal conflict should be resolved precisely in favor of the norms of the Civil Code of Ukraine. Taking into account the legally guaranteed principle of inviolability of property rights, the property owner has the right to demand the removal of obstacles in exercising the right to use and dispose of his property. Therefore, in the opinion of the authors, it is precisely based on such principles that the issue of terminating the right to use housing that is in private ownership should be regulated.

The article is dedicated to consideration and assessment of certain problematic aspects of legal regulation of reproductive rights within the legislative framework of Ukraine. It has been noted that the conclusions concerning the understanding of legal nature of reproductive rights should not be seen as general in character, considering that such understanding is in each case determined by specificities of a certain field of law in the light of which the reproductive rights are being subjected to research. Therefore, legal regulation of reproductive rights, as well as specific rules applicable to the exercise and protection of such rights, to a certain extent, is in fact implemented through the rules of civil and family law, as well as through the rules set forth in other areas of law. Reproductive rights, as a complex combination of possibilities and opportunities for an individual that are aimed at securing the reproductive function of a human being, i.e. reproduction of one's own kind, are classified in the Ukrainian civil legislation as personal non-proprietary rights of an individual that provide natural existence of a person. Proceeding from the concepts of positive duties of the State and horizontal effect of human rights, and based on the studies and analysis of the judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECtHR), specific attention has been given to the autonomy of the complex category of reproductive rights, which, in its turn and to a certain extent, is related to other personal non-proprietary rights of an individual (such as the right to life, the right to receive medical care, the right to personal privacy, the right to physical security, the right to be treated with dignity and respect, etc.). Based on the analysis of studies by various scientists, it has been established that there is no unified theoretical approach not only to the definition of the term of reproductive rights, but also to the range of rights that may be regarded as such. In considering the content of reproductive rights, one should account for differentiation of such rights in general terms within the following range of legal rights: the right to reproductive choice; the right to reproductive health; the right to be informed of reproductive rights; the right to secrecy in exercise and protection of reproductive rights; the right to protection of reproductive rights. It has been substantiated that reproductive rights are implemented in practice, certain elements of reproductive rights have been legally consolidated, which indicates not only the formation and development, but also actual functioning of reproductive rights. At the same time, the existing national legal regulations are not consistent with the actual state of affairs observed in the reproductive area. Therefore, legal relations in the field of reproductive rights of individuals require adequate and proper standardisation. The ECtHR plays a major role in shaping the approach to legal regulation of reproductive rights due to its extensive judicial practice in resolution of disputes regarding the protection of reproductive rights.