Risk of fall is one of the serious health concerns of human beings. Many tests have been developed clinically to measure risk of fall in adults. Objective: To develop preliminary normative data of functional reach test (forward reach) in young adults. Methods: A cross sectional survey was conducted in different geographical areas of Lahore. A sample of 500 healthy young adults was recruited in study through convenience sampling technique. To measure dynamic balance functional reach test (forward) was used. Results: A total sample of 500 young adults were included 22% of participants were females and 78% were males. The mean age of participants was 24± 4 years. The mean score of functional reach test (forward) was 9.87±2.9 inches, the minimum score was 3.20 inches and maximum score was 15.09 inches. There was no statistically significant difference was observed in scores of FRT in across and within the groups of both gender as p-value was > 0.05. There was also weak positive significant correlation between BMI and scores of functional reach test and p<0.05. Conclusion: The study provided the normative value of functional reach test (forward) for young adults.

Objective: The purpose of the study was to find the effect of Balance, Resistance, Aerobic, Cognitive Exercise (BRACE) and proprioceptive training on balance and mobility in knee osteoarthritis. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Independent University Hospital Faisalabad. Period: September 2020 to December 2020. Material & Methods: A sample of 18 participants were included. The participants were divided into 2 groups BRACE and proprioceptive training by lottery method. The participants got 3 training sessions per week for 8 weeks. The measurements were taken at baseline and after 8 weeks.  Statistical Package for Social Sciences(SPSS 27) was used to analyzed the data. Results: The age of participants in both groups was (55.67±2.761) years. The gender distribution of participants was female (55%) and male (45%). Within group analysis shows statistically significant relat ion on BBS and TUG from baseline to 8 weeks in both groups (p<0.05), On CTSIB frim eyes closed and foam eyes closed show significant difference in both groups (p<0.05). Between group analysis shows that no statistically significant relation in both groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both groups shows comparable improvements in balance and mobility but BRACE protocol showed more improvement as compared with proprioceptive.