Yeasts and their glycan components can have a beneficial or adverse effect on intestinal inflammation. Previous research has shown that the presence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii (Sb) reduces intestinal inflammation and colonization by Candida albicans. The aim of this study was to identify dietary yeasts, which have comparable effects to the anti-C. albicans and anti-inflammatory properties of Sb and to assess the capabilities of yeast cell wall components to modulate intestinal inflammation. Mice received a single oral challenge of C. albicans and were then given 1.5% dextran-sulphate-sodium (DSS) for 2 weeks followed by a 3-day restitution period. S. cerevisiae strains (Sb, Sc1 to Sc4), as well as mannoprotein (MP) and β-glucan crude fractions prepared from Sc2 and highly purified β-glucans prepared from C. albicans were used in this curative model, starting 3 days after C. albicans challenge. Mice were assessed for the clinical, histological and inflammatory responses related to DSS administration. Strain Sc1-1 gave the same level of protection against C. albicans as Sb when assessed by mortality, clinical scores, colonization levels, reduction of TNFα and increase in IL-10 transcription. When Sc1-1 was compared with the other S. cerevisiae strains, the preparation process had a strong influence on biological activity. Interestingly, some S. cerevisiae strains dramatically increased mortality and clinical scores. Strain Sc4 and MP fraction favoured C. albicans colonization and inflammation, whereas β-glucan fraction was protective against both. Surprisingly, purified β-glucans from C. albicans had the same protective effect. Thus, some yeasts appear to be strong modulators of intestinal inflammation. These effects are dependent on the strain, species, preparation process and cell wall fraction. It was striking that β-glucan fractions or pure β-glucans from C. albicans displayed the most potent anti-inflammatory effect in the DSS model.

Background: The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence and the significance of clinically recognized chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Hypothesis: COPD in patients with ACS is associated with worse outcome. Methods: Data were derived from a prospective, multicenter, multinationalstudy of 8167 consecutive patients hospitalized with ACS from February to June 2007 in 6 Middle Eastern countries. Data were analyzed according to the presence or absence of COPD. Demographic, management, and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Results: The prevalence of COPD was 5.3%. When compared with non-COPD patients, COPD patients were older and more likely to have diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Atypical presentations were more common in COPD patients (P = 0.001). COPD patients were less likely to be treated with thrombolytic therapy (P = 0.001), β-blockers (P = 0.001), and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and more likely to receive angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Although there was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups, patients with COPD were more likely to have heart failure (P = 0.001). Despite the fact that COPD patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy, they suffered more bleeding complications (2.8% vs 1%, P = 0.04), resulting in prolonged hospitalization. COPD was not an independent predictor of increased in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with ACS, the prevalence of COPD was 5·3%. Atypical presentation is common among COPD patients, and this may result in delayed therapy. ACS in COPD patients was associated with higher risk of heart failure and major bleeding complications without increased risk of in-hospital mortality.

CE is effective at excluding clinically significant anastomotic problems, especially after clinical anastomotic leaks. However, false positive results can be observed in asymptomatic patients, and it is unclear how much additional information CE provides over clinical assessment in the low uncomplicated anastomosis.