Background: Nephrectomy is indicated in patients with an irreversibly damaged kidney. The nephrectomy can be performed through open or laparoscopic procedure. Although there is evidence that laparoscopy is the preferred choice, additional evidence is indicated. Objective: To compare the outcomes of nephrectomy through open and laparoscopic procedures. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Urology, National Institute of Kidney Diseases and Urology, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka from July 2017 to December 2019 over a period of two and half years. In this study, 13 patients had laparoscopic nephrectomy and 17 patients had open nephrectomy. Operative time, length of hospital stay, loss of bleeding, transfusion requirement, peri and post-operative complications were recorded and compared. SPSS 12 was used for analysis. Categorical data were compared with Chi-square test and numerical data were compared with unpaired t test. Results: Maximum patients were more than 40 year old and mean age was 43.53 ± 5.55 years & 41.46 ± 6.31 years in open & laparoscopic nephrectomy group respectively. Male and female ratio was almost similar in both groups. Operative time for open nephrectomy was significantly lower than operative time for laparoscopic nephrectomy (147.9 ± 34.2 vs 184.6 ± 33.3 min; p=0.004). Mean length of post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer for patients receiving open surgery than for patients receiving laparoscopy (7.06 ± 3.67 days vs 3.92 ± 0.86 days; p = <0.001). There was no significant difference in mean postoperative time to oral intake for patients receiving open and laparoscopic nephrectomy (24.71 ± 2.91 hours and 24.00 ± 0.00 hours; p = 0.391). Per-operative complications occurred in 9 (52.9%) patients in the open nephrectomy group and in 3 (23.1%) patients in laparoscopic nephrectomy group. There was no significant group difference in complication rates (P = 0.098). Pain was reduced significantly in both groups. In each follow up, VAS was significantly lower in laparoscopic nephrectomy group than open nephrectomy group groups. Conclusion: The overall outcomes of the two procedures were similar. Pain was significantly less in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 23, No. 1, January 2020 p.52-55
Background: Several different modalities are available for ureteral stone fragmentation. From them pneumatic and holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) lithotripsy have supportive outcomes. Aims: To see the outcome of lower ureteric stone fragmentation by laser in comparison with pneumatic lithotripsy. Methods: The prospective clinical study was conducted during the period from July 2012 to June 2014 in Dhaka Medical College Hospital. From the patient admitted in Dhaka medical college hospital a total of 60 patient were selected using purposive sampling methods. Selected patients were numbered chronologically and odd number group as group A (laser lithotripsy) and even number group B (pneumatic lithtripsy). Cystoscopy followed by ureterescopy with the help of guide wire was done and stone fragmentation done by either laser lithotripsy (done in general operation theatre in Dhaka Medical College Hospital) or pneumatic lithotripsy (done in Urology operation theatre in Dhaka Medical College Hospital). Collected data were processed and analyzed using computer software SPSS (statistical package for social science), version-18. Un-pair t-test, chisquare test and Fishers Exact probability test were used to analyze the data. The findings of the study showed age and sex are almost identically distributed in both groups. Results: The mean age of group A and group- B were 35.63±11.66 and 38.90±11.21 years respectively. A male predominance was observed in both groups with 70% male in group- A and 53.3% in group-B. Stone size was also observed identically in both groups. 43% of stone are larger than 10mm in group- A and 47% stone are larger than 10mm. None of other baseline variable found very between groups. Immediate stone clearance was much higher in group-A (96.7%) then that in group- B (80%). Although both the groups demonstrated 100% clearance after 1 month. Immediate complications were higher in group B then those of group- A. Ureteral perforation in group B was found 6.7% as opposed to none in group-A. Fever in group A (6.7%) was observed to be more than 3 times higher than in group- B (23.3%). Comparison of complications after 1 and 3 months shows some differences (higher in group-B) but that is not significant. Ureteral stricture developed in 3 patients in group- B compared to nil in group- A. More than 90% of patients of group-A were released from the hospital within 3 days after operation, in contrast about 40% in group-B left the hospital within 3 days. Conclusion: So, laser lithotripsy is better option for the management of lower ureteric stone by using semi rigid ureteroscope, in term of stone migration, rate of stone fragmentation and clearance, operation time, hospital stay and complication. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 23, No. 2, July 2020 p.169-175
Background: Infertility is a global health issue affecting approximately 8-10% of couples and has multidimensional problem with social, economic and cultural implications, which can take threatening proportions in countries with strong demographic problems. Reproductive health in Bangladesh focused mainly on women health and ignoring the role of men, in spite of the important role that men are playing in reproduction and fertility which impact his family and environment. Objective: To find out the factors of infertility among the males in selected hospitals of Dhaka city. Methods: A convenience sample of 112 medical records for males diagnosed with infertility in Shaheed Suhrawardi Medical College Hospital, National Institute of Kidney Diseases and Urology, Sher-E-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Fertility center Mohammedpur Dhaka, Infertility care and Research Center Mohammedpur Dhaka were retrospectively reviewed for the cause of their infertility. Four months duration of study from May 2016 to August 2016. After completion of data collection, the collected data was checked and verified on regular basis for accuracy, consistency and completeness. Data was edited and coded. The results were presented into the form of tables and figures. Data was processed in computer by using the software SPSS, version 22 and statistical analysis was done. Results: Male factor alone was accounted for 52% of infertility among couples of these 90 had primary infertility and 22 had secondary infertility. The mean duration of infertility was 4.98±3.99 years and the mean age for male cases was 33.5±7.24 years The most common causes among infertile men were, idiopathic infertility 36.6%, varicocele 32.1%, obstruction of the seminal tract 18.8%, and hormonal problems 5.4%. Least common causes found were, medication 1.8%, spinal cord injury 1.8%, cryptorchidism 1.8%, and testicular failure 1.8%. Conclusion: More than half of the infertile couples were from an idiopathic cause. Study results confirm that understanding about male reproductive function and the environmental factors that affect it is insufficient. Provide education to infertile men by doctors in charge about potential risk factors that may affect fertility and not just provide treatment because simple changes in lifestyle can improve fertility. Bangladesh J. Urol. 2021; 24(1): 37-45
Urosepsis usually develops from a community or nosocomial acquired urinary tract infection (UTI) or during the procedure of various urinary disease such ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Urosepsis is associated with bacteriuria, Urosepsis due to manipulation during or after percuteneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or ureterorenoscopy (URS) or push bang stenting can be catastrophic despite prophylactie antibiotic coverage. This cross sectional study was carried out in Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period of July 2011 to June 2013. Sampling technique was purposive and sample size was 70. Among them 23 patients for PCNL and 47 patients for URS were selected by selection criteria. Data were collected by interview of the patients, clinical examinations and laboratory investigations using the research instrument. Data were processed and analyzed using software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 11.5. Incidence of bacteriuria and urosepsis were measured according to urine and blood culture report. Sensitivity pattern was also observed. According to this study, the incidence of bacteriuria and urosepsis were 17.1% and 5.7% respectively, Of the 70 patients, 12(17.1%) exhibited bacterial growth on urine culture, These 12 patients were then subjected to blood culture and 4(33.3%) of them were found positive. Most (83.4%) of the urine and blood infections (75%) were caused by E. coli. Some widely used antibiotics like moxicillin, Cephalexin and Ciprofloxacin were found 100% resistant in urine culture. Few sensitive antibiotics were Tobramycin (100 %), Amikacin and Ceftazidime (75%). Almost same sensitivity pattern was found in blood culture. In urosepsis, as in other types of sepsis. Urosepsis after PCNL and URS is an important and potentially catastrophic complication. Percuteneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Ureterorenoscopy (URS) occurs frequently in this institution. Although the incidence of urosepsis and bacteriuria with resistant organism is low, but it is a burning issue in management in urology practice. The apparent increase in ciprofloxacin resistant organisms appears to be associated with the increased rate of ciprofloxacin resistant organisms are observed in the general population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.