The current sedimentological and petrographical research of the Abbottabad Formation has been carried out in order to understand the formation and evolution of the Proto-Tethys Ocean during the Cambrian on the northern margin of the Indian Plate. The Muzaffarabad region is located east of the Upper Indus Basin and the southern part of the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis. The geological history of the region varies from the Precambrian to the recent period. The Cambrian Abbottabad Formation is well exposed along the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis at the core of the 500-m-thick Muzaffarabad anticline. The Abbottabad Formation is an unconformity-bounded allo-stratigraphic unit. It has an unconformable lower contact with the Late Precambrian Dogra Formation and an unconformable upper contact with the Paleocene Hangu Formation. The Abbottabad Formation has been divided into four lithofacies, from bottom to top, namely, thinly interbedded dolomite and shale, cherty-stromatolitic dolomite, oxidized limonitic-brecciated zone, and quartzite, with significant lithological changes. Petrographic studies revealed four types of dolomites: fine crystalline dolomite (Dol. I), dolomitic cryptocrystalline chert (Dol. II), algal mat-stromatolitic dolomite (Dol. III), and intraclastic-dolo-grain stone (Dol. IV). The mineral composition of dolostone was analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and found to be consistent with previous petrographic studies. The dolomite mineral content decreased from base to top, while chert increased towards the top. Elemental weight percentages through energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis show different elements constitute the minerals found in the dolostone, as confirmed by petrographic and XRD analysis. Using outcrop data, facies information, and geochemical data, a modified depositional model of the Abbottabad Formation was developed. During the Early Cambrian period, the formation was deposited in a shallow subtidal to supratidal setting of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. The top of this deposit marks the Cambrian–Paleocene boundary. Because of the progressively coarsening outcrop sequences, this formation seems to be at the very top of the Proto-Tethys Ocean’s shallow marine system.
The mineralization in this area is more closely related to the shoshonitic Niuxinshan meddling complex (NIC), which helps to depict concurrent edge magmatism metallogeny. In the present investigation, new geochronological and geochemical data are combined with previously disseminated isotopic data from granitic rocks in the NIC to establish the situation of the region's structural setting change and determine its bearing on territorial metallogeny. The new geochronological data suggest that structural change could have occurred between 155 and 185 Ma. The granitic rocks of the NIC can be geochemically divided into two groups. The geochemical signature of one group displays high rare earth element (REE) designs with irrelevant Eu anomalies, lower Yb, higher Sr, and negative Nb–Ta–Ti (NTT) abnormalities, demonstrating a volcanic‐curve climate with a thickened outside layer in a focalized setting. The other group has level REE designs with obvious regrettable Eu anomalies, higher Yb, lower Sr, and moderate NTT anomalies, indicating an intra‐plate extensional climate with a decreasing outside. According to geochronologic and isotopic data, the mineralization is Late Jurassic (155 Ma). This has been deciphered to be hereditarily associated with the crystallization of the complex's shallow crustal‐sourced bits. In addition, a structural model is presented that provides a possible explanation for the abundant polymetallic mineralization that occurs in the northern margin of the NCC after 155 Ma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.