The cover image, by K.‐S. Ng et al., is based on the Original Article Quantification and neurochemical coding of the myenteric plexus in humans: No regional variation between the distal colon and rectum, DOI: .
BackgroundIleal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) is considered the gold standard reconstructive option in ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent efforts to improve pouch outcomes have seen a push towards centralisation of surgery. This study aimed to document outcomes following pouch surgery at a population level within New South Wales (NSW), and identify factors associated with, and temporal trends of these outcomes.MethodsA retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19‐year period was performed. The primary outcome was pouch failure in patients with UC who underwent IPAA. The influence of hospital level factors (including annual volume) and patient demographic variables on this outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modelling. Temporal trends in annual volume and evidence for centralisation over the studied period were assessed using Poisson regression analysis.ResultsThe annual volume of UC pouches reduced over the study period. The pouch failure rates were 8.6% (95% CI 6.3–10.8%) and 10.6% (95% CI 8.0–13.1%) at 5‐ and 10‐years, respectively. Increasing age and non‐elective admission were associated with higher failure rates. One‐third of UC pouches (31.6%) were performed in a single institution, which averaged 6.5 pouches/year throughout the study period. Three‐quarters (19/25) of NSW public hospitals who performed pouches performed less than one UC pouch annually.ConclusionsThe outcomes following UC pouch surgery in NSW are comparable with global standards. Concentrating IBD pouch surgery with the aim of producing specialist surgical teams may be a reasonable way forward in NSW and would ensure equity of access and facilitate research and training collaboration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.