No abstract

The recovery of 1,600,000 cp bitumen from very heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs in the Grosmont unit in Albert is a great challenge. Steam injection alone may not be efficient due to the heterogeneous nature of the reservoir caused by natural fractures at different scales. Recent cold solvent studies showed limited recovery because of low diffusion coefficient and by-passing matrix oil. The hybrid use of steam and solvent could be an option to overcome some of these challenges. We adapted the previously introduced SOS-FR (Steam-Over-Solvent Injection in Fractured Reservoirs) method and conducted twelve experiments using preserved core samples from the Grosmont formation. The temperature used can be qualified as hot water injection thereby reducing the cost of heating the reservoir.The method applied in this study is based on soaking rather than continuous injection. The samples were immersed in hot water (90 o C) first to mimic low temperature pre-steaming to condition the reservoir for solvent injection. This was followed by a solvent soaking period under varying conditions (duration, solvent type, etc.). Heptane and the distillate obtained from a heavy oil upgrading facility were used as solvents. Finally, the core samples were soaked in hot water again. Oil recoveries varied between 40% and 90% OOIP with a mean value of 68%. Asphaltene precipitation as a percentage of OOIP was measured between 6.5wt% and 33wt%. The oil recovery and asphaltene precipitation depended on the solvent type, the solvent exposure duration, the position of matrix rock (horizontal or vertical), and the duration and number of solvent/hot water cycles. Most importantly, the last phase (hot water immersion) yielded substantial recovery of solvent diffused into matrix oil by applying a temperature value close to the boiling point of the solvent. The solvent retrieval was extremely fast and varied between 62% and 82% of the solvent diffused into the core during solvent exposure. Experimental observations look promising for further applications as indicated by the high recovery values. The important aspects are that the solvent from readily available distillates used for transportation of heavy oil are very responsive and the temperature requirement for final hot water injection applied to retrieve solvent was less than 100 o C. Solvent retrieval was extremely quick and reasonably high which is more likely to make the process economic.

Summary Petroleum fluids from shale light-oil and gas/condensate reservoirs generally have a high content of normal paraffins. Paraffin-wax deposition is among the challenges in shale gas and oil production and in offshore flow assurance. Low-dosage chemical additives can be effective in paraffin-wax mitigation because of their high efficiency and economics. These additives are divided into broad categories of crystal modifiers and dispersants with vastly different molecular structures and mechanisms in wax-crystal-particle stabilization and wetting. This investigation focuses on the understanding of the differences in the aggregate size and morphology of chemical additives, and it centers on (1) wax-particle sedimentation from diluted petroleum fluids in vial tests, (2) wax-crystal-particle-size distributions and morphology by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and polarized-light microscopy, and (3) the wetting state from the effect of water. In two of the three petroleum-fluid samples used in this work, there is no visible precipitation at the bottom of the vials at temperatures below the wax-appearance temperature (WAT). The microscopic image of fluids along the length of the tube shows that the wax-particle size and intensity increase from top to bottom. To observe precipitation, we dilute the crude with a hydrocarbon such as n-heptane. The sedimentation of wax is then observed. The petroleum fluids used in this work have very low asphaltene content, and there is no complication from asphaltene precipitation. Our study shows that a small amount of crystal modifier and dispersant can reduce crystal-particle size to the submicron scale, and change the crystal morphology. We investigate the differences in the mechanisms of dispersants and crystal modifiers in bulk. Water, which is often coproduced with petroleum fluids, can increase the effectiveness of dispersants significantly by altering the wetting state of the wax-particle surface. Such enhancement is not found in crystal modifiers. Both additives affect the rheology of petroleum fluids.

We adapted the previously introduced SOS-FR (Steam-Over-Solvent Injection in Fractured Reservoirs) method and conducted 12 experiments using preserved core samples from the Grosmont formation. The method applied in this study is based on soaking rather than continuous injection. The samples were immersed in hot water (90 °C), first to mimic low-temperature presteaming to condition the reservoir for solvent injection. This was followed by a solvent soaking period under varying conditions (duration, solvent type, etc.). Heptane and the distillate obtained from a heavy oil upgrading facility were used as solvents. Finally, the core samples were soaked in hot water again. Oil recoveries varied between 40% and 90% OOIP, with a mean value of 68%. Asphaltene precipitation, as a percentage of original oil in place (OOIP), was measured between 6.5 wt % and 33 wt %. The oil recovery and asphaltene precipitation depended on the solvent type, the solvent exposure duration, the position of matrix rock (horizontal or vertical), and the duration and number of solvent/hot water cycles. Most importantly, the last phase (hot water immersion) yielded substantial recovery of solvent diffused into matrix oil by applying a temperature value close to the boiling point of the solvent. The solvent retrieval was extremely fast and varied between 62% and 82% of the solvent diffused into the core during solvent exposure. Experimental observations look promising for further applications, as indicated by the high recovery values. The important aspects are that the solvent from readily available distillates used for transportation of heavy oil are very responsive and the temperature requirement for final hot water injection applied to retrieve solvent was <100 °C. Solvent retrieval was extremely quick and reasonably high, which is more likely to make the process economical.

Lloydminster area that straddles Alberta and Saskatchewan border contains vast amounts of heavy oil deposits in thin unconsolidated formations. Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand (CHOPS) has been successfully implemented in these reservoirs. However, primary recovery is still low averaging below 10%. How to economically recover the large amount of remaining oil in place is a challenge. Therefore, an effective follow up recovery process is required.Steam injection technologies cannot be widely applied because most of the Lloydminster heavy oil reservoirs are thin and the heat losses to overburden and under burden make the process uneconomic. Alternative solvent methods are not commercial yet due to uncertain oil recovery rates and low solvent recovery. Hybrid application of the aforementioned two technologies using hot water together with solvents could be an economic post CHOPS recovery process. The wormholes created during the primary recovery can be used to contact large reservoir volumes with hot water and solvent. This paper contains the results of hot water and solvent oil recovery experiments conducted in preserved heavy oil cores. Experimental work consisted of three phases. Cores were immersed in hot water in the first phase to pre-heat the formation. Next, cores were exposed to heptane as hydrocarbon solvent. Finally, cores were immersed in hot water again to recover the oil as well as the solvent. The ultimate oil recoveries varied between 42% and 88% OOIP and, the asphaltene precipitation varied between 2.5 wt% and 11.7 wt%. Experiments were also carried out with a distillate from Husky's Lloydminster upgrader used for heavy oil transportation in the pipelines. Better results were obtained if the distillate was used instead of the pure hydrocarbon solvent.It was observed that oil recovery at the end of the initial hot water injection phase due to thermal expansion and viscosity reduction was negligible compared to the ultimate recovery. However, the first phase serves to condition the reservoir for better diffusion in the second phase when the solvent is injected. The final phase of hot water injection causes the water to strongly imbibe into the matrix enhancing the oil and the solvent recovery.