This article describes one of the effects of globalization on young Muslims in Indonesia. They interact with a variety of cultural products from all corners of the world. Focusing on Indonesia, this article argues that the emergence of globalization has provided opportunities for young Muslims to negotiate Islamic value representations of Korean TV dramas. Using ethnography method, this article selects young Indonesian Muslims who like Korean television drama as informants. The emergence of transnational cultural products was believed to play an important role in the process of 'cultural imperialism' among young people. The information and views presented are not considered to be a ‘healthy’ menu for Muslim youth. In fact, in cultural studies, media imperialism or cultural imperialism is famously contested. By interviewing and observing 42 informants, this article finds that Muslim youth do not receive all the messages from the media passively. During their consumption on Korean television dramas, young Muslims are negotiating their representations. They are capable of selecting values from the television dramas. These Muslim consumers in this context do not just accept all the messages and representations of Korean television dramas. Indonesian Muslim youth have an innate cultural identity and conscious knowledge, which they have obtained from their learning environments such as education and culture. Muslim youth interpret "stories" in drama by relating them to their Islamic values. Keywords: Negotiation, representations, Islamic values, youth, Korean TV dramas.

The world of education during a pandemic is forced to use an online learning system. This is evidenced by the issuance of regional and central regulations relating to online learning rules. There are many platforms that can be used to do online learning, one of which is edmodo. The edmodo platform can be used more flexibly with the help of laptops and cellphones that students often use, besides that, it does not require much quota. The research method used is a mix method by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The population of this study is students from University of Serang Raya. The object of the research was students of civil engineering, unsera in engineering mathematics courses. The result of this research is that the experimental class is better than the control class in terms of the mean value. The application of learning uses a learning management system, namely students upload assignments, download material, collect assignments and ask questions in the comments column related to the material provided by the lecturer.

AbstrakPenelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh hasil studi pendahuluan mengenai kemampuan literasi matematis di salah satu SMP Negeri Kota Serang. Tujuan utama penelitian ini untuk menyelidiki peningkatan kemampuan literasi matematis siswa, sebagai akibat dari pembelajaran dengan pendekatan Metacognitive Guidance berbantuan GeoGebra (MG+GeoGebra) dan pembelajaran biasa (PB) yang ditinjau dari kategori PAM (tinggi, sedang, dan rendah). Penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam non equivalent pretest -postest -control group design. Hasil analisis data menyimpulkan bahwa: 1.a) ditinjau secara keseluruhan, peningkatan kemampuan literasi matematis siswa yang mendapatkan pembelajaran MG+GeoGebra lebih baik daripada siswa yang mendapatkan pembelajaran PB; 1.b) peningkatan kemampuan literasi matematis siswa kategori PAM tinggi dan sedang pada kelompok eksperimen lebih baik dibandingkan dengan siswa kategori PAM tinggi dan sedang pada kelompok kontrol; 2) tidak terdapat interaksi antara faktor pembelajaran yang diberikan dan kategori PAM (tinggi, sedang, dan rendah) terhadap kemampuan literasi matematis. Kata kunci: Metacognitive Guidance, GeoGebra, Literasi Matematis AbstractThe purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of Metacognitive Guidance Approach assisted by GeoGebra on mathematical literacy. In particular, the study compares two learning environment: a) conventional learning, and b) metacognitive guidance learning using GeoGebra. This study was carried out on student"s ability level (low, medium and high ability group), and their competence on mathematical literacy. This research was non equivalent pretest -postest -control group design. The results of data analysis showed that: 1.a) the students who were exposed to MG+GeoGebra outperform students that were not exposed to MG+GeoGebra on mathematical literacy; 1.b) the students in high and medium ability group who were exposed to MG+GeoGebra outperform students that were not exposed to MG+GeoGebra on mathematical literacy; 2) there was no interaction between learning method and student"s ability level on mathematical literacy.