Summary:
The residency application process is expensive, costing an average of $2149 in application fees per applicant during the 2020–2021 cycle. Additionally, the number of applications per applicant continues to rise annually across all specialties. This considerable cost creates a financial barrier for students, particularly those from first-generation and underrepresented backgrounds. Moreover, the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application generates a lengthy, diluted output that hinders a holistic review. We developed the Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA), a focused, specialty-specific application external to ERAS with the goal of lessening the financial barrier for students and improving reviewer satisfaction. The PSCA was revised over a 5-month period after prepiloting with stakeholders. All integrated plastic surgery programs were invited to participate. Of the 86 plastic surgery programs, 20 agreed to participate in the pilot, accepting both ERAS and PSCA for direct comparison. A total of 181 completed applications were received through the PSCA. In a postparticipation survey, most applicants and reviewers felt that the PSCA offered a reasonable alternative to ERAS, despite minor technical difficulties. The PSCA pilot demonstrates that there is a reasonable alternative to applying to residency through ERAS and offers a template for developing a system that is not cost-prohibitive to applicants. The PSCA also demonstrates the benefit of a specialty-specific, customizable application for reviewer efficiency and satisfaction.
Although the upper extremity is the most commonly injured part of the body, many studies have indicated that there is a lack of emergency hand coverage in the United States. In 2010, our laboratory evaluated on-call hand coverage in Tennessee (TN) and found that only 7% of hospitals had a hand surgeon on call for emergency cases at all times. In 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was implemented with the goal of increasing overall access to care and decreasing health care costs. Hand surgeons were surveyed on their attitudes toward the ACA, and the majority of surgeons surveyed disagreed or strongly disagree that the ACA would improve access to emergent hand surgery. This study aimed to determine if there has been an increase in emergency hand coverage in TN since the implementation of the ACA. A survey was administered to all hospitals in TN with both an emergency department and operating room to determine the percentage of TN hospitals offering elective hand surgery and on-call emergency hand coverage. With 94% of TN hospitals responding to the emergency department survey, we determined that there has been a 138% significant increase in the percentage of hospitals reporting 24/7 emergency hand coverage by a hand specialist since our last study in 2010. There has also been a significant increase in elective hand coverage in TN, although much smaller at 13% since 2010. This study suggests that there has been an overall increase in access to hand care in TN since the implementation of the ACA, most profoundly seen in the increase in hand specialists available for emergent cases.
Introduction:
Radiographic assessment of facial fractures with computed tomography (CT) scanning has become standard of care. As imaging resolution has improved, findings such as herniation of extraocular muscles (EOM) have become a means of diagnosing conditions like orbital entrapment. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these findings has not been well-studied. We sought to evaluate the value of radiographic findings such as fat herniation, EOM contour irregularity, and EOM herniation in predicting orbital entrapment after orbital fracture. Secondary endpoints include diplopia, abnormal EOM motility, and the need for surgical fixation.
Methods:
A single institution, retrospective review at a regional level 1 trauma center was conducted. Patients with orbital fractures were identified by International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes and CT reports were queried for the terms “herniation,” “herniated,” “entrapped,” and “entrapment.” Four hundred records were analyzed.
Results:
Sixty-seven percent of radiology reports mentioned “entrapped” or “entrapment,” while the incidence of clinical entrapment was 2.8%. The odds of entrapment, diplopia, and abnormal EOM motility were higher in those with EOM herniation; however, EOM herniation had a positive predictive value of 7.9% for clinical entrapment. Fat herniation alone and EOM contour irregularity had positive predictive values of 4.2% and 4.8%, respectively.
Conclusions:
While the odds of entrapment appear higher in patients with EOM herniation, this imaging finding is not predictive of clinical entrapment. Fat herniation and EOM contour irregularity did not have higher odds of entrapment, nor were they predictive. Diagnosis of orbital entrapment should be based primarily on physical exam, with CT as an adjunct only. The assumption that radiographic findings indicate orbital emergencies may result in unnecessary interfacility transfers, subspecialist consultations, and emergency operative procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.