BackgroundThe World Health Organization recommends universal drug susceptibility
testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to guide
treatment decisions and improve outcomes. We assessed whether DNA sequencing
can accurately predict antibiotic susceptibility profiles for first-line
anti-tuberculosis drugs. MethodsWhole-genome sequences and associated phenotypes to isoniazid, rifampicin,
ethambutol and pyrazinamide were obtained for isolates from 16 countries
across six continents. For each isolate, mutations associated with
drug-resistance and drug-susceptibility were identified across nine genes,
and individual phenotypes were predicted unless mutations of unknown
association were also present. To identify how whole-genome sequencing might
direct first-line drug therapy, complete susceptibility profiles were
predicted. These were predicted to be pan-susceptible if predicted
susceptible to isoniazid and to other drugs, or contained mutations of
unknown association in genes affecting these other drugs. We simulated how
negative predictive value changed with drug-resistance prevalence.Results10,209 isolates were analysed. The greatest proportion of phenotypes were
predicted for rifampicin (9,660/10,130; (95.4%)) and the lowest for
ethambutol (8,794/9,794; (89.8%)). Isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and
pyrazinamide resistance was correctly predicted with 97.1%, 97.5% 94.6% and
91.3% sensitivity, and susceptibility with 99.0%, 98.8%, 93.6% and 96.8%
specificity, respectively. 5,250 (89.5%) drug profiles were correctly
predicted for 5,865/7,516 (78.0%) isolates with complete phenotypic
profiles. Among these, 3,952/4,037 (97.9%) predictions of pan-susceptibility
were correct. The negative predictive value for 97.5% of simulated drug
profiles exceeded 95% where the prevalence of drug-resistance was below
47.0%. ConclusionsPhenotypic testing for first-line drugs can be phased down in favour of DNA
sequencing to guide anti- tuberculosis drug therapy.
BackgroundWhole-genome sequencing is increasingly used in clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis and study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC). MTC consists of several genetically homogenous mycobacteria species which can cause tuberculosis in humans and animals. Regions of difference (RDs) are commonly regarded as gold standard genetic markers for MTC classification.ResultsWe develop RD-Analyzer, a tool that can accurately infer the species and lineage of MTC isolates from sequence reads based on the presence and absence of a set of 31 RDs. Applied on a publicly available diverse set of 377 sequenced MTC isolates from known major species and lineages, RD-Analyzer achieved an accuracy of 98.14 % (370/377) in species prediction and a concordance of 98.47 % (257/261) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage prediction compared to predictions based on single nucleotide polymorphism markers. By comparing respective sequencing read depths on each genomic position between isolates of different sublineages, we were able to identify the known RD markers in different sublineages of Lineage 4 and provide support for six potential delineating markers having high sensitivities and specificities for sublineage prediction. An extended version of RD-Analyzer was thus developed to allow user-defined RDs for lineage prediction.ConclusionsRD-Analyzer is a useful and accurate tool for species, lineage and sublineage prediction using known RDs of MTC from sequence reads and is extendable to accepting user-defined RDs for analysis. RD-Analyzer is written in Python and is freely available at https://github.com/xiaeryu/RD-Analyzer.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3213-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.