Summary The COVID‐19 pandemic has created many challenges in the management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). The recommendation for avoidance of steroids by WHO led to the off‐licence use, supported by NHS England, of thrombopoietin mimetics (TPO‐RA) for newly diagnosed or relapsed ITP. This is a real‐world prospective study which investigated the treatment patterns and outcomes in this setting. Twenty‐four hospitals across the UK submitted 343 cases. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of ITP treatment, but TPO‐RAs were more effective. Incidental COVID‐19 infection was identified in a significant number of patients (9·5%), while 14 cases were thought to be secondary to COVID‐19 vaccination.

No abstract

Summary Many medications have been reported to be associated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) through pharmacovigilance data and published case reports. Whilst there are existing data available regarding drug‐induced thrombotic microangiopathy, there is no available synthesis of evidence to assess drug‐induced TTP (DI‐TTP). Despite this lack of evidence, patients with TTP are often advised against using many medications due to the theoretical risk of DI‐TTP. This systematic review evaluated the evidence for an association of medications reported as potential triggers for TTP. Of 5098 records available 261 articles were assessed further for eligibility. Fifty‐seven reports, totalling 90 patients, were included in the final analysis. There were no cases where the level of association was rated as definite or probable, demonstrating a lack of evidence of any drug causing DI‐TTP. This paucity of evidence was also demonstrated in the pharmacovigilance data, where 613 drugs were reported as potential causes of TTP without assessment of the strength of association. This systematic review demonstrates the need for standardised reporting of potential drugs causing TTP. Many reports omit basic information and, therefore, hinder the chance of finding a causative link if one exists.

No abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants have become the mainstay of the management of venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation, and long-term anticoagulation is indicated for those at high risk of further thrombotic events. This includes patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome, for whom the ‘triple positive’ laboratory combination of lupus anticoagulant, β2-glycoprotein-1 and anti-cardiolipin antibodies signify those at greatest risk. Data from meta-analysis and randomised control trials have raised the concern that direct oral anticoagulants may be less effective than vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, particularly those with the triple positive profile. This article reviews the diagnosis of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, strategies for testing without interruption of anticoagulation, evidence concerning the safety of direct oral anticoagulants in this setting, and the implications for current investigation and management of unprovoked venous thromboembolism.