Edited by Paul FraserThe isolated apical domain of the Escherichia coli GroEL subunit displays the ability to suppress the irreversible fibrillation of numerous amyloid-forming polypeptides. In previous experiments, we have shown that mutating Gly-192 (located at hinge II that connects the apical domain and the intermediate domain) to a tryptophan results in an inactive chaperonin whose apical domain is disoriented. In this study, we have utilized this disruptive effect of Gly-192 mutation to our advantage, by substituting this residue with amino acid residues of varying van der Waals volumes with the intent to modulate the affinity of GroEL toward fibrillogenic peptides. The affinities of GroEL toward fibrillogenic polypeptides such as A␤(1-40) (amyloid-␤(1-40)) peptide and ␣-synuclein increased in accordance to the larger van der Waals volume of the substituent amino acid side chain in the G192X mutants. When we compared the effects of wildtype GroEL and selected GroEL G192X mutants on ␣-synuclein fibril formation, we found that the effects of the chaperonin on ␣-synuclein fibrillation were different; the wild-type chaperonin caused changes in both the initial lag phase and the rate of fibril extension, whereas the effects of the G192X mutants were more specific toward the nucleus-forming lag phase. The chaperonins also displayed differential effects on ␣-synuclein fibril morphology, suggesting that through mutation of Gly-192, we may induce changes to the intermolecular affinities between GroEL and ␣-synuclein, leading to more efficient fibril suppression, and in specific cases, modulation of fibril morphology.

Inflammatory mechanisms are implicated in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, it is unclear whether inflammatory alterations are a cause or consequence of neurodegeneration leading to dementia. Clarifying this issue would provide valuable insight into the early diagnosis and therapeutic management of AD. To address this, we compared the mRNA expression profiles of cytokines in the brains of AD patients with “non-demented individuals with AD pathology” and non-demented healthy control (ND) individuals. “Non-demented individuals with AD pathology” are referred to as high pathology control (HPC) individuals that are considered an intermediate subset between AD and ND. HPC represents a transition between normal aging and early stage of AD, and therefore, is useful for determining whether neuroinflammation is a cause or consequence of AD pathology. We observed that immunological conditions that produce cytokines in the HPC brain were more representative of ND than AD. To validate these result, we investigated the expression of inflammatory mediators at the protein level in postmortem brain tissues. We examined the protein expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α and its receptors (TNFRs) in the brains of AD, HPC, and ND individuals. We found differences in soluble TNFα and TNFRs expression between AD and ND groups and between AD and HPC groups. Expression in the temporal cortex was lower in the AD brains than HPC and ND. Our findings indicate that alterations in immunological conditions involving TNFR-mediated signaling are not the primary events initiating AD pathology, such as amyloid plaques and tangle formation. These may be early events occurring along with synaptic and neuronal changes or later events caused by these changes. In this review, we emphasize that elucidating the temporal expression of TNFα signaling molecules during AD is important to understand the selective tuning of these pathways required to develop effective therapeutic strategies for AD.