Purpose There is a strong need to improve the prognostication of breast cancer patients in order to prevent over- and undertreatment, especially when considering adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumour stroma characteristics might be valuable in predicting disease progression. Methods Studies regarding the prognostic value of tumour–stroma ratio (TSR) in breast cancer are evaluated. Results A high stromal content is related to a relatively poor prognosis. The most pronounced prognostic effect of this parameter seems to be observed in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Conclusions TSR assessment might represent a simple, fast and reproducible prognostic factor at no extra costs, and could possibly be incorporated into routine pathological diagnostics. Despite these advantages, a robust clinical validation of this parameter has yet to be established in prospective studies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4987-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The tumor–stroma ratio (TSR) was evaluated as a promising parameter for breast cancer prognostication in clinically relevant subgroups of patients. The TSR was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin‐stained tissue slides of 1,794 breast cancer patients from the Nottingham City Hospital. An independent second cohort of 737 patients from the Netherlands Cancer Institute to Antoni van Leeuwenhoek was used for evaluation. In the Nottingham Breast Cancer series, the TSR was an independent prognostic parameter for recurrence‐free survival (RFS; HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10–1.66, p = 0.004). The interaction term was statistically significant for grade and triple‐negative status. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a more pronounced effect of the TSR for RFS in grade III tumors (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.43–2.51, p < 0.001) and triple‐negative tumors (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10–3.14, p = 0.020). Comparable hazard ratios and confidence intervals were observed for grade and triple‐negative status in the ONCOPOOL study. The prognostic value of TSR was not modified by age, tumor size, histology, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status or lymph node status. In conclusion, patients with a stroma‐high tumor had a worse prognosis compared to patients with a stroma‐low tumor. The prognostic value of the TSR is most discriminative in grade III tumors and triple‐negative tumors. The TSR was not modified by other clinically relevant parameters making it a potential factor to be included for improved risk stratification.

The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has previously been found to be a strong prognostic parameter in primary breast cancer tumors. Since the presence of tumor cells in lymph nodes is important for clinical decision making, the influence of TSR in the primary breast tumor combined with the TSR in tumor-positive lymph nodes on prognosis was evaluated. Women with invasive breast cancer without distant metastasis who underwent an axillary lymph node dissection between 1985 and 1994 at the Leiden University Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. TSR assessment was performed on hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue slides. In total, 87 (45.5%) primary tumors were scored as stroma-low and 104 (54.5%) as stroma-high. Patients with a high stromal percentage in the primary tumors had a statistically significant worse relapse free period (RFP) compared to stroma-low tumors (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.37-2.82, p < 0.001). A total number of 915 lymph nodes were assessed for TSR. In 101 (52.9%) patients, heterogeneity was observed between stroma percentage category in primary tumor and lymph nodes. The combination of TSR of the primary tumor combined with TSR of tumor-positive lymph nodes strengthened each other as independent prognostic parameter for RFP (p = 0.019). Patients with primary tumor stroma-low/lymph nodes stroma-low tumors showed strongly improved RFP rates compared to patients with primary tumor stroma-high/lymph node stroma-high tumors with 10-year percentages of 58 versus 8%, respectively. Assessing the TSR on tumor-positive lymph nodes can provide additional prognostic information. Stromal activation strongly differs between primary tumors and lymph node metastasis.

PurposeComplex interactions occur between cancer cells and cells in the tumor microenvironment. In this study, the prognostic value of the interplay between tumor–stroma ratio (TSR) and the immune status of tumors in breast cancer patients was evaluated.MethodsA cohort of 574 breast cancer patients was analyzed. The percentage of tumor stroma was visually estimated on Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained histological tumor tissue sections. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I, HLA-E, HLA-G, markers for regulatory T (Treg) cells, natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs).ResultsTSR (P < .001) and immune status of tumors (P < .001) were both statistically significant for recurrence free period (RFP) and both independent prognosticators (P < .001) in which tumors with a high stromal content behave more aggressively as well as tumors with a low immune status. Ten years RFP for patients with a stroma-low tumor and high immune status profile was 87% compared to 17% of patients with a stroma-high tumor combined with low immune status profile (P < .001). Classical HLA class I is the most prominent immune marker in the immune status profiles.ConclusionsDetermination of TSR is a simple, fast and cheap method. The effect on RFP of TSR when combined with immune status of tumors or expression of classical HLA class I is even stronger. Both are promising for further prediction and achievement of tailored treatment for breast cancer patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-017-4617-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women. Early detection of this disease improves survival and therefore population screenings, based on mammography, are performed. However, the sensitivity of this screening modality is not optimal and new screening methods, such as blood tests, are being explored. Most of the analyses that aim for early detection focus on proteins in the bloodstream. In this study, the biomarker potential of total serum N-glycosylation analysis was explored with regard to detection of breast cancer. In an age-matched case-control setup serum protein N-glycan profiles from 145 breast cancer patients were compared to those from 171 healthy individuals. N-glycans were enzymatically released, chemically derivatized to preserve linkage-specificity of sialic acids and characterized by high resolution mass spectrometry. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate associations of specific N-glycan structures as well as N-glycosylation traits with breast cancer. In a case-control comparison three associations were found, namely a lower level of a two triantennary glycans and a higher level of one tetraantennary glycan in cancer patients. Of note, various other N-glycomic signatures that had previously been reported were not replicated in the current cohort. It was further evaluated whether the lack of replication of breast cancer N-glycomic signatures could be partly explained by the heterogenous character of the disease since the studies performed so far were based on cohorts that included diverging subtypes in different numbers. It was found that serum N-glycan profiles differed for the various cancer subtypes that were analyzed in this study.