Objectives: To compare emergency department (ED) utilization by individuals who present with self-inflicted injuries with utilization by control populations. Individuals with self-inflicted injuries commonly present to the ED, yet little research has been conducted on this population in this setting. Methods: Individuals who had an ED presentation in 1995-1996 for a self-inflicted injury were tracked prospectively for three to four years of follow-up. This group was matched by age and gender to two groups: individuals who presented with asthma and individuals who presented with other complaints. Data on return visits to the ED were collected from an administrative database. Groups were compared on rates of return visits. Results: There were 478 individuals randomly selected for each group. Individuals in the self-inflicted injury group had higher rates of return visits to the ED over the follow-up period: 232.7 visits per 100 person-years for the self-inflicted injury group, compared with 117.6 for the asthma group, and 83.0 for the ''other'' group (p\0.001). The self-inflicted injury group had higher rates for many types of diagnoses: self-inflicted injuries, mental disorders, substance abuse, unintentional injuries, assault, headache pain, and other complaints (all p\0.001). Patients with more than three repeat visits per year were more common in the self-inflicted injury group (20.1%) than the asthma or ''other'' groups (9.2% and 5.6%, respectively). Conclusions: Individuals who harm themselves are chronic users of the ED. The ED represents an opportune setting from which individuals can be directed to appropriate treatment programs.

No abstract

Objectives: Our goal was to determine the effectiveness of an intervention aimed at improving the emergency department (ED) documentation of pediatric injuries. Methods: All physicians and nursing staff in the ED of an urban teaching hospital and trauma centre underwent focused injury surveillance training and were instructed how to document 14 injuryspecific data elements. Pocket reminder cards were provided, and pediatric injury charts were flagged. Subsequently, random samples of pediatric injury charts were analyzed from a 3-month period prior to the intervention and from the corresponding months after the intervention. Postintervention documentation was compared to pre-intervention documentation for the 14 predefined data elements. Results: Six of the 14 data elements were charted more frequently, and 2 less frequently during the post-intervention phase. Odds ratios ranged from 4.59 (95%CI, 3.40 to 6.19) for charting "the presence of an adult observer" to 0.09 (95%CI, 0.01 to 0.76) for charting "sports equipment related to the injury." The "flagging" of injury charts, as a visual reminder for clinicians to document injury data, seemed to be the most effective component of the intervention. Conclusion: A simple intervention, consisting of staff training, chart modification, and visual flagging of charts, can increase the amount of injury information documented by ED clinicians. Efforts to improve ED charting are most likely to succeed if they include visual prompts for clinicians.

The growing practice of including intentional injuries (suicide and interpersonal violence) under the injury control umbrella has produced some controversy. The present study was designed to determine whether or not there might be an empirical basis for this initiative from an ecological point of view by examining the associations among unintentional and intentional injuries across 17 geographically defined health regions. The study was set in the Province of Alberta, Canada, where health services were delivered to a population of 2.96 million persons in 1999 through 17 regional health authorities. The results of a principal components analysis showed that nearly all causes of injury-hospitalization loaded on a single factor. It was not possible to produce separate factors for intentional and unintentional injuries. The strong intercorrelation among all measures suggests that there is an empirical basis for the view that intentional and unintentional injuries belong under the same conceptual umbrella, at least at the ecological level.