As academic health center seek to address the changes in the health care system and in medical education, several approaches have been tried, some successfully, others not. The authors describe a successful approach that involves a close partnership between the health professions schools at two academic institutions, and agencies from the surrounding community. Specifically, the Center for Healthy Communities, begun in 1991 and formally institutionalized in 1994 in Dayton, Ohio, is a partnership among the schools of medicine, nursing, and professional psychology at Wright State University (WSU); the department of social work at WSU; the Allied Health Division of Sinclair Community College; more than 200 individuals (from grassroots neighborhood people to civic leaders); and 50 health and human services organizations in the Dayton area. The Center is recognized as a force for change in health professions education and health care delivery both in the community and in the academic settings. The authors explain how the Center was formed, list its goals (such as establishing strong partnerships among community educators and providers and educating students in the delivery of primary health care in the community), explain three principles that have been followed and that were crucial to the success of the Center (for example, individuals in the community must become empowered to capitalize on their strengths), and discuss the major difficulties that the community and the academic institutions encountered and strategies for meeting them (such as the importance of building trust and the importance of learning the needs identified by the community partners, not just those identified by the academic partners). The authors maintain that a successful community-academic partnership must be built on the foundation of community health development, a concept analogous to economic development, and that such a partnership can be a powerful tool for making a difference in the community's health.

Inappropriate use of antibiotics has been well documented for inpatient settings, but there are few studies in ambulatory patients. In a prospective study, the authors monitored the outpatient prescribing patterns of internal medicine residents and evaluated the effect of placing a one-page set of antibiotic guidelines in each patient examining room. Appropriateness of antibiotic choices was scored periodically. A 12-month pre-intervention survey of antibiotic use showed that 50% of the choices were inappropriate. Comparison of a four-month post-intervention analysis with the same four-month interval in the pre-intervention period showed no significant difference between the percentages of inappropriate prescriptions. The most common reasons for inappropriate use were: 1) failure to document a clinically significant bronchial infection, and 2) inadequate evaluation of nonspecific urinary tract complaints. The authors conclude that the ready availability of information about appropriate antibiotic use is not effective in changing antibiotic choices, and that educational strategies regarding antibiotic use must also address diagnostic evaluation.

Virtually no differences in the students' performances on the undergraduate and postgraduate measures were found among sites for the two clerkships.

In 1989, an expert panel appointed by the Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine proposed minimum curricular content requirements for health promotion-disease prevention, including recommendations for timing, duration, and course sequencing during medical school. Making clinical preventive medicine an integral part of a primary care rotation is a central feature of the proposal. The panel presents recommendations for using the Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, which assesses the effectiveness of 169 types of prevention interventions, in both undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Recommendations for incorporating the guide into the undergraduate medical school curriculum are outlined. The recommendations include options for using the guide as part of a curriculum in quantitative skills, in clinical preventive medicine, in a primary care rotation, as a health services and community dimension curriculum, and as part of continuing self-education. Recognizing that teaching methods and curriculum structures are varied in preventive medicine, the panel designed the recommendations to be adaptable to all medical schools' programs. The recommendations are aimed at achieving the goal of making preventive medicine an integral part of the education, training, and practice of physicians.

The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, prepared in 1989 by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, assesses the effectiveness of 169 types of preventive interventions. In 1990, the Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine formed a panel to review the guide and recommend ways it could be used to enhance both undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. This paper outlines the panel's recommendations of the types of knowledge and attitudes on which postgraduate medical education in prevention should be built. Detailed recommendations are presented, based on the summary findings of the guide, for residency education in prevention. Implementation of these recommendations will integrate preventive services into the continuum of medical care. These recommendations are presented to achieve the goal of educating physicians to approach the total patient, putting the patient's health rather than the disease process in the forefront of primary medical care.