Objective: To investigate whether drugs targeting peripheral cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptor ameliorate adiposity comparable to central CB1-receptor antagonist or not. Measurements: Receptor binding assay and functional assay in vitro. Pharmacokinetic parameters in mice, brain uptake clearance of compounds in rats and antagonism on the CB1-agonist-induced hypothermia in mice. Diet consumption, body weight changes, hepatic gene expression of sterol-regulatory element-binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) and plasma/tissue concentrations of compounds in HF diet-induced obese (HF-DIO) mice after acute and chronic treatment. Results: Compound-1, an SR141716A derivative, is a peripheral CB1-receptor-selective antagonist that is 10 times less potent than SR141716A in in vitro evaluations. Although the plasma concentrations of Compound-1 are five times higher than those of SR141716A, its potency is still 10 times lower than that of SR141716A in reducing the consumption of normal or HF diet by mice. Through evaluations of brain uptake and the effect on CB1-agonist-induced hypothermia, it was verified that the bloodbrain barrier (BBB) penetration of Compound-1 is much lower than that of SR141716A. In HF-DIO mice, chronic treatment by Compound-1 showed dose-dependent antiobesity activities, while its brain distribution was very low as compared with that of SR141716A. Compound-1's effective doses for antiobesity activity were just over 30 mg kg À1 . However, Compound-1 completely suppressed the elevated hepatic SREBP-1 expression even at 10 mg kg À1 . Conclusion: These results suggest that (1) central CB1 receptors mediate anorectic response of CB1-receptor antagonists and (2) peripheral modulations, including SREBP-1 expression, are not major mechanisms in the antiobesity effects of CB1-receptor antagonists.

Opportunistic salpingectomy did not have any negative effects on ovarian reserve or increased surgical risk.

Background:The purpose of this study was to identify genes that are differentially expressed in chemosensitive serous papillary ovarian carcinomas relative to those expressed in chemoresistant tumours.Methods:To identify novel candidate biomarkers, differences in gene expression were analysed in 26 stage IIIC/IV serous ovarian adenocarcinomas (12 chemosensitive tumours and 14 chemoresistant tumours). We subsequently investigated the immunohistochemical expression of GRIA2 in 48 independent sets of advanced ovarian serous carcinomas.Results:Microarray analysis revealed a total of 57 genes that were differentially expressed in chemoresistant and chemosensitive tumours. Of the 57 genes, 39 genes were upregulated and 18 genes were downregulated in chemosensitive tumours. Five differentially expressed genes (CD36, LIFR, CHL1, GRIA2, and FCGBP) were validated by quantitative real-time PCR. The expression of GRIA2 was validated at the protein level by immunohistochemistry, and patients with GRIA2 expression showed a longer progression-free and overall survival (P=0.051 and P=0.031 respectively).Conclusions:We found 57 differentially expressed genes to distinguish between chemosensitive and chemoresistant tumours. We also demonstrated that the expression of GRIA2 among the differentially expressed genes provides better prognosis of patients with advanced serous papillary ovarian adenocarcinoma.