Chronic high-fat feeding in rats induces profound whole-body insulin resistance, mainly due to effects in oxidative skeletal muscle. The mechanisms of this reaction remain unclear, but local lipid availability has been implicated. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of three short-term physiological manipulations intended to lower muscle lipid availability on insulin sensitivity in high-fat-fed rats. Adult male Wistar rats fed a high-fat diet for 3 weeks were divided into four groups the day before the study: one group was fed the normal daily high-fat meal (FM); another group was fed an isocaloric low-fat high-glucose meal (GM); a third group was fasted overnight (NM); and a fourth group underwent a single bout of exercise (2-h swim), then were fed the normal high-fat meal (EX). In vivo insulin action was assessed using the hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp (plasma insulin 745 pmol/l, glucose 7.2 mmol/l). Prior exercise, a single low-fat meal, or fasting all significantly increased insulin-stimulated glucose utilization, estimated at either the whole-body level (P < 0.01 vs. FM) or in red quadriceps muscle (EX 18.2, GM 28.1, and NM 19.3 vs. FM 12.6 +/- 1.1 micromol x 100 g(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.05), as well as increased insulin suppressibility of muscle total long-chain fatty acyl-CoA (LC-CoA), the metabolically available form of fatty acid (EX 24.0, GM 15.5, and NM 30.6 vs. FM 45.4 nmol/g; P < 0.05). There was a strong inverse correlation between glucose uptake and LC-CoA in red quadriceps during the clamp (r = -0.7, P = 0.001). Muscle triglyceride was significantly reduced by short-term dietary lipid withdrawal (GM -22 and NM -24% vs. FM; P < 0.01), but not prior exercise. We concluded that muscle insulin resistance induced by high-fat feeding is readily ameliorated by three independent, short-term physiological manipulations. The data suggest that insulin resistance is an important factor in the elevated muscle lipid availability induced by chronic high-fat feeding.
Objective This scoping review concerns expertclinical practice (ECP) by nuclear medicine practitioners (NMP), encompassing radiographers, technologists and nurses. ECP is typically demonstrated by clinical skills with higher levels of autonomy and responsibility traditionally fulfilled by physicians. The Advanced Clinical Practice (ACP) framework by Health Education England (2017) specifies ECP as one aspect of advanced role progression. This scoping review aims to identify and categorise the extent and type of the existing NMP ECP evidence to support the establishment of Nuclear Medicine ACP.Methods PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Ovid Medline were searched for peer-reviewed literature published between 2001 and 2021 using extended and advanced practice as key terms alongside nuclear medicine and each NMP profession. Due to the sparsity of results, conference abstracts from prominent international societies were also searched. Studies were independently reviewed and graded for inclusion by four NMP. ResultsOf the 36 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 80.6% were conference abstracts and 66.7% were single-centres studies. Commonly reported NM ECP activities included image interpretation, cardiac stressing and therapies. Less reported activities include ordering complementary diagnostic procedures, invasive procedures and physical examinations. The United Kingdom presented itself at the forefront of NMP ECP publications. ConclusionThis study demonstrates evidence of NMP ECP across a variety of clinical roles. The dominance of conference abstracts highlights NMP ECP as an emerging area of role extension and a potential preference for information dissemination by NMP. Greater research into specific NMP ECP activities is required particularly studies of greater sample size and robusticity. Nucl Med Commun
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.