BackgroundCirculating tissue transglutaminase IgA (TTG IgA) concentrations are sensitive and specific indicators of celiac disease, but discrepancies between serologic and histologic findings still occur. We hypothesized that fecal markers of inflammation and protein loss would be greater in patients with untreated celiac disease than in healthy controls. Our study aims to evaluate multiple fecal and plasma markers in celiac disease and correlate these findings with serologic and histologic findings as non-invasive means of evaluating disease activity.MethodsParticipants with positive celiac serologies and controls with negative celiac serologies were enrolled at the time of upper endoscopy. Blood, stool and duodenal biopsies were collected. Concentrations of fecal lipocalin-2, calprotectin and alpha-1-antitrypsin and plasma lipcalin-2 were determined. Biopsies underwent modified Marsh scoring. Significance was tested between cases and controls, modified Marsh score and TTG IgA concentration.ResultsLipocalin-2 was significantly elevated in the stool (p=0.007) but not the plasma of participants with positive celiac serologies compared to controls. There was no significant difference in fecal calprotectin or alpha-1 antitrypsin between participants with positive celiac serologies and controls. Fecal alpha-1 antitrypsin >100mg/dL was specific, but not sensitive for biopsy proven celiac disease.ConclusionsLipocalin-2 is elevated in the stool but not the plasma of patients with celiac disease suggesting a role in the local inflammatory response. Calprotectin was not a useful marker in the diagnosis of celiac disease and did not correlate with degree of histologic changes on biopsy. While random fecal alpha-1 antitrypsin was not significantly elevated in cases compared to controls, an elevation of greater than 100mg/dL was 90% specific for biopsy proven celiac disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.