Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is caused by silencing of the FMR1 gene, which encodes a protein with a critical role in synaptic plasticity. The molecular abnormality underlying FMR1 silencing, CGG repeat expansion, is well characterized; however, delineation of the pathway from DNA to RNA to protein using biosamples from well characterized patients with FXS is limited. Since FXS is a common and prototypical genetic disorder associated with intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a comprehensive assessment of the FMR1 DNA-RNA-protein pathway and its correlations with the neurobehavioral phenotype is a priority. We applied nine sensitive and quantitative assays evaluating FMR1 DNA, RNA, and FMRP parameters to a reference set of cell lines representing the range of FMR1 expansions. We then used the most informative of these assays on blood and buccal specimens from cohorts of patients with different FMR1 expansions, with emphasis on those with FXS (N = 42 total, N = 31 with FMRP measurements). The group with FMRP data was also evaluated comprehensively in terms of its neurobehavioral profile, which allowed molecular–neurobehavioral correlations. FMR1 CGG repeat expansions, methylation levels, and FMRP levels, in both cell lines and blood samples, were consistent with findings of previous FMR1 genomic and protein studies. They also demonstrated a high level of agreement between blood and buccal specimens. These assays further corroborated previous reports of the relatively high prevalence of methylation mosaicism (slightly over 50% of the samples). Molecular-neurobehavioral correlations confirmed the inverse relationship between overall severity of the FXS phenotype and decrease in FMRP levels (N = 26 males, mean 4.2 ± 3.3 pg FMRP/ng genomic DNA). Other intriguing findings included a significant relationship between the diagnosis of FXS with ASD and two-fold lower levels of FMRP (mean 2.8 ± 1.3 pg FMRP/ng genomic DNA, p = 0.04), in particular observed in younger age- and IQ-adjusted males (mean age 6.9 ± 0.9 years with mean 3.2 ± 1.2 pg FMRP/ng genomic DNA, 57% with severe ASD), compared to FXS without ASD. Those with severe ID had even lower FMRP levels independent of ASD status in the male-only subset. The results underscore the link between FMR1 expansion, gene methylation, and FMRP deficit. The association between FMRP deficiency and overall severity of the neurobehavioral phenotype invites follow up studies in larger patient cohorts. They would be valuable to confirm and potentially extend our initial findings of the relationship between ASD and other neurobehavioral features and the magnitude of FMRP deficit. Molecular profiling of individuals with FXS may have important implications in research and clinical practice.

No abstract

No abstract

Several case reports have discussed the difficulty in differentiating junctional pseudomelanocytic nests as a result of lichenoid inflammation from a true melanocytic neoplasm. Even immunohistochemistry can be misleading in these cases with both Melan-A and Mart-1 frequently resulting in false positivity as a result of nonspecific labeling of nonmelanocytic cells containing melanosomes. We present a series of 2 similar cases which were initially misdiagnosed as melanoma in situ likely as a result of Mart-1 positivity of the pseudomelanocytic nests. However, in our review, a significant lichenoid reaction was apparent at the dermal-epidermal junction. Staining with microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) showed a normal density of melanocytes along the dermal-epidermal junction and failed to uniformly label the Mart-1-positive pseudomelanocytic nests. In both patients, medications frequently resulting in fixed drug eruptions were identified, and a final diagnosis of fixed drug eruption was rendered in both cases. In light of these findings we suggest MITF is a more useful marker for evaluating lentiginous proliferations along the dermal-epidermal junction particularly when dealing with the differential diagnosis of lichenoid reaction with pseudomelanocytic nests versus melanoma in situ.

Purpose: Human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 1 and HER 1/2 inhibitors have shown benefit against a wide range of solid tumors. However, their use is associated with rash in 40% to 90% of patients, which impacts quality of life and interrupts antineoplastic therapy. The pathologic characteristics of affected skin remain unclear, precluding development of rational therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in histologic and immunohistochemical alterations in rash caused by lapatinib, a dual HER1/2 inhibitor (HER1/2i), and the single HER1 inhibitors (HER1i) cetuximab, erlotinib, and panitumumab.Experimental Design: For each of the four drugs, skin biopsies were collected and analyzed from 8 patients with rash (n = 32). Blinded independent histologic analysis and automated measurement of 17 skin biomarkers involved in proliferation, differentiation, and inflammation were conducted.Results: Increased expression of pAKT and decreased dermal K16 and p27 for HER1/2i when compared with each of the HER1i were observed. In addition, decreased epidermal atrophy and follicular neutrophilic infiltrate were evidenced in the skin of patients on HER1/2i when compared with HER1i.Conclusions: We found a lower inhibition of epidermal kinetics and decreased inflammation in HER1/2i-induced rash. These findings underscore differences in skin toxicity as related to specificity of HER blockade, concordant with clinical tolerability and decreased severity of skin toxicity seen with the HER1/2i lapatinib compared with the HER1 inhibitors cetuximab, erlotinib, and panitumumab.