Introduction
Shoulder disorders are frequently encountered by clinicians and are a common cause of musculoskeletal pain in the general population. Clinical tests specific to each shoulder pathology, MRI, and arthroscopy are the most relied upon modalities of diagnosis used by many clinicians. The aim of this study was to correlate clinical tests and MRI with arthroscopy as the gold standard and whether a negative MRI with a positive clinical test could justify an arthroscopy.
Materials and methods
A total of 120 consecutive patients who had a history of shoulder pain or instability were evaluated by clinical tests and MRI, and underwent arthroscopy. Based on the confirmatory findings of arthroscopy, they were classified as True Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP) and False Negative (FN) for each modality i.e., clinical tests and MRI.
Results
Clinical assessment of rotator cuff tears in comparison to arthroscopy yielded a sensitivity of 96.88%, specificity of 92.86% and diagnostic accuracy of 95%, whilst MRI had a sensitivity of 90.62%, specificity of 92.86% and diagnostic accuracy of 91.67%. In anterior labral lesions, clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 94.44%, specificity of 97.62 % and diagnostic accuracy of 96.67%, whilst MRI had a sensitivity of 83.33%, specificity of 92.86%, with diagnostic accuracy of 90%. Interestingly, in the clinical assessment of superior labral tear from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 95%, and diagnostic accuracy of 93.33% were observed while MRI had a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 92.50%, and diagnostic accuracy of 81.67%.
Conclusion
On the basis of these results, clinical assessment appears to be an effective tool in diagnosing shoulder pathologies, whereas MRI, though reliable in the identification of rotator cuff tears and instability, does not identify patients with SLAP lesions effectively. This study reinforces the importance of a good clinical examination of the shoulder, especially in chronic pain and an uncertain MRI, therefore improving patient management.
