The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is the principal target of the psychoactive constituent of marijuana, the partial agonist Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC)1. Here we report two agonist-bound crystal structures of human CB1 in complex with a tetrahydrocannabinol (AM11542) and a hexahydrocannabinol (AM841) at 2.80 Å and 2.95 Å resolution, respectively. The two CB1–agonist complexes reveal important conformational changes in the overall structure, relative to the antagonist-bound state2, including a 53% reduction in the volume of the ligand-binding pocket and an increase in the surface area of the G-protein-binding region. In addition, a ‘twin toggle switch’ of Phe2003.36 and Trp3566.48 (superscripts denote Ballesteros–Weinstein numbering3) is experimentally observed and appears to be essential for receptor activation. The structures reveal important insights into the activation mechanism of CB1 and provide a molecular basis for predicting the binding modes of Δ9-THC, and endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids. The plasticity of the binding pocket of CB1 seems to be a common feature among certain class A G-protein-coupled receptors. These findings should inspire the design of chemically diverse ligands with distinct pharmacological properties.

SUMMARY Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is the principal target of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a psychoactive chemical from Cannabis sativa with a wide range of therapeutic applications and a long history of recreational use. CB1 is activated by endocannabinoids, and is a promising therapeutic target for pain management, inflammation, obesity and substance abuse disorders. Here, we present the 2.8 Å crystal structure of human CB1 in complex with AM6538, a stabilizing antagonist, synthesized and characterized for this structural study. The structure of the CB1-AM6538 complex reveals key features of the receptor and critical interactions for antagonist binding. In combination with functional studies and molecular modeling, the structure provides insight into the binding mode of naturally occurring CB1 ligands, such as THC, and synthetic cannabinoids. This enhances our understanding of the molecular basis for the physiological functions of CB1 and provides new opportunities for the design of next-generation CB1-targeting pharmaceuticals.

Graphical AbstractHighlights d Crystal structure of human CB2 in complex with antagonist AM10257 is determined d A high degree of conformational similarity with the agonistbound CB1 is uncovered d The yin-yang relationship of CB2 and CB1 will facilitate the design of selective drugs In BriefThe structure of the human cannabinoid receptor CB2 reveals how small molecules affect CB2 differently than CB1 and point to principles that could inform rational and selective drug design. SUMMARYThe cannabinoid receptor CB2 is predominately expressed in the immune system, and selective modulation of CB2 without the psychoactivity of CB1 has therapeutic potential in inflammatory, fibrotic, and neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we report the crystal structure of human CB2 in complex with a rationally designed antagonist, AM10257, at 2.8 Å resolution. The CB2-AM10257 structure reveals a distinctly different binding pose compared with CB1. However, the extracellular portion of the antagonist-bound CB2 shares a high degree of conformational similarity with the agonist-bound CB1, which led to the discovery of AM10257's unexpected opposing functional profile of CB2 antagonism versus CB1 agonism. Further structural analysis using mutagenesis studies and molecular docking revealed the molecular basis of their function and selectivity for CB2 and CB1. Additional analyses of our designed antagonist and agonist pairs provide important insight into the activation mechanism of CB2. The present findings should facilitate rational drug design toward precise modulation of the endocannabinoid system.

The cannabinoid system appears to play a critical facilitative role in mediating the reinforcing effects of nicotine and relapse to nicotine-seeking behaviour in abstinent subjects based on the actions of cannabinoid (CB) receptor antagonists. However, the effects of CB receptor stimulation on nicotine self-administration and reinstatement have not been systematically studied. Here, we studied the effects of WIN 55,212-2, a CB1/2 agonist, on intravenous nicotine self-administration under fixed-ratio (FR) and progressive-ratio (PR) schedules of reinforcement in rats. The effects of WIN 55,212-2 on responding for food under similar schedules were also studied. In addition, the effects of WIN 55,212-2 on nicotine- and cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine seeking were also studied, as well as the effects of WIN 55,212-2 on nicotine discrimination. WIN 55,212-2 decreased nicotine self-administration under the FR schedule. However, co-administration of WIN 55,212-2 with nicotine decreased responding for food, which suggests that this effect was non-selective. In contrast, WIN 55,212-2 increased both nicotine self-administration and responding for food under the PR schedule, produced dose-dependent reinstatement of nicotine seeking, and enhanced the reinstatement effects of nicotine-associated cues. Some of these effects were reversed by the CB1 antagonist rimonabant, but not by the CB2 antagonist AM630. In the drug discrimination tests between saline and 0.4 mg/kg nicotine, WIN 55,212-2 produced no nicotine-like discriminative effects but significantly potentiated discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine at the low dose through a CB1-receptor-dependent mechanism. These findings indicate that cannabinoid CB1-receptor stimulation increases the reinforcing effects of nicotine and precipitates relapse to nicotine-seeking behaviour in abstinent subjects. Thus, modulating CB1-receptor signalling might have therapeutic value for treating nicotine dependence.

The CB1 inverse agonist/antagonist SR141716A recently has been introduced for the management of obesity (rimonabant; Acomplia) and appears to have beneficial effects. However, its utility may be hampered in some individuals by adverse effects including nausea or emesis or by mood depression. The recent development of biochemically 'neutral' antagonists such as AM4113 (Sink et al. 2007) has allowed an initial evaluation of the proposition that the adverse effects of SR141716A are associated with its inverse agonist activity. Thus far, data comparing SR141716A and AM4113 across several species indicate that both drugs produce dose-related direct effects on operant behavior within the same range of doses that serve to antagonize the behavioral and hypothermic effects of a CB1 agonist. However, initial observations suggest that AM4113 may not produce preclinical indications of nausea or emesis. Further studies with AM4113 and other novel CB1 antagonists differing in efficacy should amplify our understanding of the relationship between the pharmacological activity of CB1 antagonists and their behavioral effects. KeywordsSR141716A; rimonabant; AM4113; AM4054; inverse agonism; neutral antagonism; behavior; hypothermia A rapid succession of events in the first half of the 1990s including the discovery of the cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptor and the isolation and synthesis of its endogenous ligands anandamide and 2-AG, energized the explosion of scientific interest in cannabinoid pharmacology and the development of novel ligands, including those that produced Δ 9 THClike effects and those could counter, i.e., antagonize, the effects of Δ 9 THC and other CB1 agonists at the CB1 receptor. It is interesting that, notwithstanding the acknowledged medicinal value of cannabis products with CB1 agonist actions, the first major therapeutic agent to emerge from these research efforts has been the CB1 antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716A (rimonabant; [1]). Perhaps it is not surprising that its initial therapeutic targets have been based a The preparation of this manuscript and portions of the work described herein were supported under NIH/NIDA DA19205 b Portions of the work described herein have been presented previously at the 2005 meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence in Orlando, FL and at the