In a phase 2 study of patients with symptomatic celiac disease and histologic evidence of significant duodenal mucosal injury, latiglutenase did not improve histologic and symptom scores when compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in change from baseline between groups. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01917630.

Midstream urine (MSU) culture remains the gold standard diagnostic test for confirming urinary tract infection (UTI). We previously showed that patients with chronic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) below the diagnostic cutoff on MSU culture may still harbor bacterial infection and that their antibiotic treatment was associated with symptom resolution. Here, we evaluated the results of the United Kingdom’s MSU culture in symptomatic patients and controls. Next, we compared the bacterial enrichment capabilities of the MSU culture with those of a 50-µl uncentrifuged culture, a 30-ml centrifuged sediment culture, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. This study was conducted on urine specimens from 33 LUTS patients attending their first clinical appointment (mean age, 48.7 years; standard deviation [SD], 16.5 years), 30 LUTS patients on treatment (mean age, 47.8 years; SD, 16.5 years) whose symptoms had relapsed, and 29 asymptomatic controls (mean age, 40.7 years, SD, 15.7 years). We showed that the routine MSU culture, adopting the UK interpretation criteria tailored to acute UTI, failed to detect a variety of bacterial species, including recognized uropathogens. Moreover, the diagnostic MSU culture was unable to discriminate between patients and controls. In contrast, genomic analysis of urine enriched by centrifugation discriminated between the groups, generating a more accurate understanding of species richness. In conclusion, the United Kingdom’s MSU protocol misses a significant proportion of bacteria, which include recognized uropathogens, and may be unsuitable for excluding UTI in patients with LUTS.

BackgroundAdenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP) is a neurotransmitter and inflammatory cytokine implicated in the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract disease. ATP additionally reflects microbial biomass thus has potential as a surrogate marker of urinary tract infection (UTI). The optimum clinical sampling method for ATP urinalysis has not been established. We tested the potential of urinary ATP in the assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms, infection and inflammation, and validated sampling methods for clinical practice.MethodsA prospective, blinded, cross-sectional observational study of adult patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and asymptomatic controls, was conducted between October 2009 and October 2012. Urinary ATP was assayed by a luciferin-luciferase method, pyuria counted by microscopy of fresh unspun urine and symptoms assessed using validated questionnaires. The sample collection, storage and processing methods were also validated.Results75 controls and 340 patients with LUTS were grouped as without pyuria (n = 100), pyuria 1-9 wbc μl-1 (n = 120) and pyuria ≥10 wbc μl-1 (n = 120). Urinary ATP was higher in association with female gender, voiding symptoms, pyuria greater than 10 wbc μl-1 and negative MSU culture. ROC curve analysis showed no evidence of diagnostic test potential. The urinary ATP signal decayed with storage at 23°C but was prevented by immediate freezing at ≤ -20°C, without boric acid preservative and without the need to centrifuge urine prior to freezing.ConclusionsUrinary ATP may have a role as a research tool but is unconvincing as a surrogate, clinical diagnostic marker.

Forty-eight men with urodynamically proven bladder outflow tract obstruction (BOO) and 19 with retention secondary to benign prostatic hypertrophy were treated by balloon dilatation of the prostate as out-patients; 31 were dilated with 20 mm and 36 with 25 mm balloons. Of the 48 men with BOO, 37 had repeat cystometrograms at intervals ranging from 3 to 11 months after dilatation and 33 (89%) remained obstructed by urodynamic criteria. Of 6 who only had a peak flow rate assessment, 5 had a flow less than 12 ml/s. Of the 19 patients in retention only 3 were able to void and all are obstructed. Symptoms of hesitancy, poor stream, frequency and nocturia were improved in less than 50% of patients. No reliable correlation was found between objective response and balloon size, length of time of dilatation, prostate size or morphology, detrusor pressure or stability, or post-dilatation urethrogram appearances. Balloon dilatation to 25 mm is not adequate therapy for bladder outflow tract obstruction or urinary retention from prostatic hypertrophy.

Many prostatectomies are performed on the basis of symptoms alone; 39% of patients referred by their family doctors and 23% of patients who were on waiting lists for prostatectomy of other hospitals, but who had not undergone any urodynamic investigations, were found to be unobstructed on urodynamic criteria. A screening peak urinary flow rate of 12 ml/s or less was associated with urodynamic evidence of obstruction in 95% of cases; 35% of patients with symptoms of outflow obstruction and a flow rate greater than 12 ml/s were also found to be obstructed. One year post-operatively, 84% of patients who were selected for surgery on combined symptomatic and urodynamic criteria were pleased symptomatically with their result. The failure of detrusor instability to resolve following prostatectomy was associated with symptomatic failure of treatment. Residual obstruction was demonstrated in 5 patients who had undergone prostatectomy and were asymptomatic at this time. This study illustrates that objective measures are necessary in the assessment of patients prior to prostatectomy in order to select only patients who are obstructed. The importance of a screening flow rate is emphasised. All patients who underwent surgery had cystometric evidence of obstruction but the symptomatic results of surgery were no better than the results in patients who had been assessed according to non-urodynamic selection criteria. We have thus failed to identify a need for routine cystometry in the pre-operative assessment of these patients. Cystometry does, however, have a role in assessing patients with pre-operative flow rates greater than 12 ml/s and in those who remain symptomatic following prostatectomy.