Aim: To evaluate the prevalence and clinical features of Fabry disease in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Methods: α-Galactosidase A activity was measured in the dried blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry in 5,572 dialysis patients (63.7% males). Diagnosis of Fabry disease was confirmed by sequencing of the GLA gene and by evaluating the globotriaosylsphingosine level in the dried blood spots. Results: Fabry disease was diagnosed in 20 (0.36%) patients at the median age of 43 years (28; 58). There were 19 males and 1 female. The prevalence of Fabry disease in dialysis patients was 0.53% in males and 0.05% in females. However, it was higher in males aged 30–49 years. Seventeen different GLA mutations were identified; 5 of them were novel. The median age at the initiation of hemodialysis was similar between patients with missense and nonsense mutations. Sixteen patients (80.0%) presented with typical symptoms of Fabry disease from childhood (neuropathic pain in 16, angiokeratoma in 7 and hypohidrosis/anhidrosis in 16). All patients had left ventricular hypertrophy, and 8 patients (40%) had a history of ischemic stroke. Two patients died (recurrent stroke in one and sudden cardiac death in another patient). Conclusions: Screening in at-risk patients remains the feasible approach to diagnose Fabry disease in patients with ESRD and their family members, given a low awareness of Fabry disease among the Russian nephrologists.

The recessive form of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a debilitating disease caused by impairments in the junctions of the dermis and the basement membrane of the epidermis. Mutations in the COL7A1 gene induce multiple abnormalities, including chronic inflammation and profibrotic changes in the skin. However, the correlations between the specific mutations in COL7A1 and their phenotypic output remain largely unexplored. The mutations in the COL7A1 gene, described here, were found in the DEB register. Among them, two homozygous mutations and two cases of compound heterozygous mutations were identified. We created the panel of primary patient-specific RDEB fibroblast lines (FEB) and compared it with control fibroblasts from healthy donors (FHC). The set of morphological features and the contraction capacity of the cells distinguished FEB from FHC. We also report the relationships between the mutations and several phenotypic traits of the FEB. Based on the analysis of the available RNA-seq data of RDEB fibroblasts, we performed an RT-qPCR gene expression analysis of our cell lines, confirming the differential status of multiple genes while uncovering the new ones. We anticipate that our panels of cell lines will be useful not only for studying RDEB signatures but also for investigating the overall mechanisms involved in disease progression.

No abstract