Background: Asthma, a common yet complex airway disorder affecting about 11% of Australians, is well-controlled in only 54% of people with asthma. Those with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma are more likely to experience recurrent and potentially life-threatening exacerbations. It is therefore important that GPs can initiate a systematic approach for the management of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma to identify those whose condition may improve by addressing contributory factors and those who require specialist input. We therefore aimed to develop and deliver an educational program for GPs on the systematic management of patients with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma and evaluate the effectiveness of this program. Methods: We developed an educational program on the management of difficult-to-treat and severe asthma in primary care that was delivered to GPs and other health professionals between January and June 2018. We evaluated the effectiveness of the program using a retrospective pre-test with post-survey, administered to GPs directly after program participation. Results: Over 1000 general practice health professionals participated in the educational program, including 890 GPs of whom 226 (25%) completed the survey. Following program participation, a greater proportion of GPs identified factors they would assess in managing a patient with poor asthma control, particularly for considering the risk of future adverse outcomes (+ 51%), changes in lifestyle (+ 38%), and self-management strategies (+ 35%). GPs indicated a greater awareness of the biologic therapies that specialists could consider prescribing to their patients with severe asthma (+ 75%), of the requirements for a patient to be prescribed a biologic therapy (+ 73%) and that patients with different phenotypic characteristics can respond differently to standard therapy (+ 67%). The proportion of GPs who would refer appropriate patients to a specialist also significantly increased. Conclusions: This study suggests that an evidence-based educational program can improve GP knowledge, confidence and intended practice in managing patients with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma.

IntroductionAustralia has had high rates of antibiotic use in primary care. Consumer and health professional knowledge and practices in the community vary. In 2012, NPS MedicineWise implemented a five-year national educational program for consumers, general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacies to reduce antibiotic use in Australia.MethodsFor consumers, a social marketing approach was used focusing on the winter months. Strategies leveraged collectivism, nudge theory, celebrity endorsement and co-creation and used multiple communication channels. For health professionals, interventions were most intense in 2012 with additional activities implemented each year including face-to-face educational visiting, audits, comparative prescribing feedback, case studies and point-of-care materials. Surveys were conducted periodically to evaluate changes in knowledge and awareness. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) claims data were analyzed. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development data was used to compare Australian antibiotic per capita consumption to other countries. Time series analyses were used to estimate the cumulative program effect comparing observed and expected monthly dispensing volumes of antibiotics commonly prescribed for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), had interventions not occurred.ResultsBetween 2012 and 2017, GP antibiotic PBS prescriptions reduced by 18.4 percent. Antibiotic defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants reduced from 23.7 in 2012 to 18.4 in 2016, similar to Norway (18.6 in 2016) and the UK (18.7). Time series modelling estimated 24.8 percent fewer GP antibiotic URTI prescriptions by 2017 versus no program. Consumer survey results indicated increased awareness of antibiotic resistance (50 percent in 2011, 74 percent in 2017) and the minority expect/request antibiotics for URTIs (22 percent in 2017).ConclusionsA five-year national educational program with multiple and repeated interventions for health professionals and consumers has resulted in ongoing reductions in antibiotic use in primary care.

Introduction:Many countries have a national antimicrobial resistance strategy. In Australia, primary care is especially important because this setting encompasses a high proportion of antibiotic use. While antibiotic use decreased during the 1990s, it began to increase again in the mid-2000s. In response to this, in 2009 NPS MedicineWise implemented a series of nationwide educational interventions for consumers, family physicians (general practitioners), and community pharmacies that aimed to reduce excessive antibiotic use.Methods:For consumers a social marketing approach was used, including strategies that leveraged collectivism, nudge theory, celebrity endorsement, and co-creation. Channels included social, print, radio, and other media as well as practice waiting rooms and pharmacies. For health professionals, interventions included face-to-face education, audits, comparative prescribing feedback, case studies, and point-of-care materials. Surveys of consumers and family physicians were conducted periodically to evaluate changes in knowledge and behavior. National Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims data were analyzed using a Bayesian structural time-series model to estimate the cumulative effect of interventions by comparing the observed and expected monthly dispensing volumes if the interventions had not occurred.Results:The consumer survey results indicated that more people were aware of antibiotic resistance (seventy-four percent in 2017 versus seventy percent in 2014), with the minority requesting or expecting antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) (twenty-two percent in 2017). People underestimated the usual duration of symptoms for URTIs and were more inclined to expect antibiotics beyond that timeframe. Compared with non-participants, family physicians who participated in the program reported more frequent discussions about hand hygiene (ninety percent versus eighty-two percent) and proper use of antibiotics with patients (ninety-five percent versus eighty-eight percent). Between 2009 and 2015 there was an estimated fourteen percent reduction in prescriptions dispensed to concessional patients for antibiotics commonly prescribed for URTIs.Conclusions:Family physicians and consumers have responded positively to national programs. Sustaining and building on these improvements will require continued education and further innovation.

No abstract