Aim and Objectives:To evaluate the cervical marginal microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomer as intermediate layers and whether the difference in the thickness of these intermediate layers would influence the microleakage.Materials and Methods:Standardized class II box only cavities (4 mm bucco lingual width 2 mm mesio distal depth with the gingival margin 1 mm above the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) were restored as follows: Group A Restoration with packable composite alone, Group B, Subgroup 1, 1 mm flowable composite liner + packable composite, Sub Group 2, 2 mm flowable composite liner + packable composite, Group C, Subgroup 1, 1 mm resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) liner + packable composite, Sub Group 2, 2 mm RMGIC liner + packable composite, The specimens were thermocycled, stained with methylene blue, sectioned to evaluate the dye penetration. Data were analyzed using Kruskall Wallis Test and Mann Whitney U test.Results:There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. The difference in the thickness of the intermediate layers did not influence the microleakage.Conclusions:Use of 1 mm of flowable composite intermediate layer improved the sealing ability of packable composites than the differential thickness of resin modified glass ionomer.
Introduction:Endodontic treatment removes all pathogens, such as Enterococcus faecalis from pulp and root canals. The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in removing E. faecalis from the root canal used with three different irrigation methods.
Materials and methods:This study was conducted on freshly extracted maxillary incisors. After biomechanical preparation, root canals were injected with E. faecalis. Three groups were made which contained 30 teeth in each group; 2 mL of NaOCl solution was used for irrigation followed by agitation with K-files in group I; 2 mL of NaOCl solution was used for irrigation and ultrasonic agitation was done in group II. In group III, an alternate irrigation with NaOCl and 3% hydrogen peroxide was done. The fourth group (control) was irrigated with sterile saline solution. E. faecalis bacteria were sampled to the root canals with paper points and were transferred to tubes that contained 5 mL of brain heart infusion broth. Tubes were incubated and the presence of broth turbidity was suggestive of bacteria remaining in the root canal.Results: All three groups showed no statistically significant difference. However, difference existed between experimental groups and control groups.
Conclusion:The author concluded that all three methods of application of NaOCl were effective in disinfecting the root canal than the saline solution.
Clinical significance:No single irrigant has 100% efficiency. Thus by this study, a best irrigating solution with maximum properties can be established.
The complex anatomy of the root canal system takes up many configurations and variations are not uncommon. A clinician should be aware of the normal, so as to recognize these aberrations in the anatomy. Successful root canal therapy is achieved by thorough shaping and cleaning of the root canal system followed by obturation of the radicular space. The aim of the present article is to describe a case of a mandibular second molar with an unusual anatomy of having a single mesial canal and two distal canals which is in reverse to usually seen, encountered during routine endodontic treatment. The clinician should always keep in mind that anatomic aberrations can occur in any tooth and the recognition of these is achieved by thorough examination of the internal anatomy of the tooth and its radiographs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.