The effect of changing water content on the bulk density of undisturbed cores of a cracking clay was examined in laboratory experiments. The results were compared with the relationship between bulk density and water content established by core sampling the same soil in the field. Over the water content range measured in the field soil, the laboratory cores shrank three-dimensionally and normally. Small departures from normal shrinkage were attributed to the formation of cracks within the cores, and to the occurrence of some structural shrinkage in cores previously wet to high water contents. Swelling of cores was approximately three-dimensional, except for some unconfined swelling which occurred in the core surface. Unidimensional swelling was induced by confining dry cores to reduce the void ratio before wetting. Subsequent shrinkage was three-dimensional, indicating that the soil particles were reoriented during the unidimensional swelling phase. While the laboratory measurements showed that the soil volume changes were essentially three-dimensional and normal, the field data indicated that unidimensional shrinkage occurred at water contents greater than 0.47 g g-1. These field results were attributed to sampling inaccuracies associated with the use of a small-diameter core sampler, the actual field bulk density relationship being considered three-dimensional.

Monthly runoff and soil loss simulated by WEPP (Water Erosion Prediction Project) were compared with field observations on a pineapple farm in south-east Queensland for a 3-year period. The soil at the site is sandy. Slope length and steepness are 36m and 5.5%, respectively. Three treatments, namely bare, farmers’ conventional practice, and mulching of the furrows, were used. Infiltration and erodibility parameters were determined using WEPP-recommended equations and measurable soil properties. These parameters were also calibrated using the runoff and soil loss data for the bare plot only. Apart from the soil loss prediction for the mulching treatment, for which WEPP did not perform well, the average coefficient of efficiency in runoff and soil loss predictions was –0.02 using soil property-based parameter values and 0.66 using calibrated parameter values. The corresponding r 2 values are 0.57 and 0.81, respectively. On the whole, WEPP is able to reproduce the trend and variations in runoff and soil loss among different treatments for the site. Parameter values based on measurable soil properties would greatly under-estimate the runoff and soil loss for the site. Thus, use of WEPP outside its US database requires calibration with locally obtained data. It was also found that WEPP does not seem to model effectively the situation where there is considerable flow impediment with the furrows covered with mulch. We are unable to reject WEPP because the statistical performance indicators are reasonable for the site, and because the model is so complex that it is nearly impossible to pinpoint the source of discrepancy and articulate the model deficiency on physical grounds.

Soil chemical and physical properties of a black cracking clay were measured after five years under a zero tillage and stubble retention trial. Stubble retention slightly increased the organic carbon content of the 0-10 cm layer, and the dispersion ratio of the 0-4 cm layer. Stubble retention increased dry aggregate size in the 0-4 cm layer of the zero tilled treatments, apparently due to a reduction in the rate of drying of the surface after rain. Changes in the distribution of cations in the surface soil developed in the absence of tillage, with lower exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and higher exchangeable potassium percentage in the 0-4 cm layer under zero tillage. The reduction in ESP in the 0-4 cm layer under zero tillage also reduced dispersion ratios. The ratio CEC : % clay for the 0-4 cm layer was reduced by zero tillage. Chloride profiles gave evidence for increased deep infiltration under zero tillage. This is attributed to the presence of cracks that were not closed by tillage.

This paper explores the processes responsible for clay dispersion, and the formation of large dry aggregates, in cracking clay soils. It also isolates the soil factors causing variations in dry aggregate size using regression analysis. Twelve cracking clay soil samples were selected on visual differences in dry aggregate size distribution following seedbed preparation, and a range of soil structural and chemical properties were measured. The per cent dry aggregates > 5 mm was found to increase with resistance to mechanical abrasion, stability to wet sieving after capillary wetting, and dispersion ratio, indicating that large dry aggregates are formed as a result of binding by dispersed clay. Both raindrop impact and puddling by cultivation may be involved in dispersion. There was a strong relationship between dry aggregate size in the 0-10 cm layer and salt content in the subsurface (60-90 cm) layer. Coarse surface aggregation is explained in terms of limited profile hydraulic conductivity. For the soils studied, the properties of the surface layer appear to be responsible, at least in part, for the limitation in profile hydraulic conductivity. Dry aggregate size in the 0-10 cm layer was not simply correlated with any of the chemical properties of that layer. However, equations containing two (ESP and CEC per gram of clay) or three (ESP, per cent clay and CEC) independent variables were derived to explain variations in dry aggregate size, both for the 12 soils studied and for a wider range of Queensland cracking clay soils.

Dry sieving, wet sieving, and aggregate bulk density measurements were used to study the mechanisms of dry aggregate formation in three swelling clay soils. These experiments showed that, for a given soil, a single probability function can be used for all dry aggregate fractions to predict their water stability and the distribution of water stable aggregates in their unstable portions. This result is explained in terms of the mode of formation of dry aggregates. Coarse aggregation in these soils was attributed to the binding action of dispersed clay. Soil disruption experiments showed that, above a certain moisture content, soil samples were susceptible to disruption by mechanical action. This moisture content is linearly related to the specific surface area of the soil, and agrees closely with the soil liquid limit. Aggregate disruption in the coarsely aggregated soil sample is explained in terms of soil mineralogy and electrolyte concentration. The effect of rate of reflocculation of disrupted clay on soil aggregation is considered.