In a double-blind double-dummy multicenter study, patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized to receive either nifedipine (n = 416, 47.6% women) or lisinopril (n = 412, 50% women), and side effects were registered by specific questioning, by spontaneous reports, and by use of visual analog scales. Cough was spontaneously reported to occur in 8.5% with lisinopril compared to 3.1% with nifedipine. Women treated with lisinopril reported cough spontaneously three times more often than men, 12.6% v 4.4%, whereas no differences between the sexes were observed during the placebo period or during nifedipine treatment. Similar gender differences were observed during specific questioning. Furthermore, nonsmokers reported an increase in cough more often than did smokers.

A number of metabolic pathways are subject to both genetic polymorphism and interethnic differences. A catabolic pathway of 6-mercaptopurine, red blood cell (RBC) thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity showed genetic polymorphism in Caucasians, but variation according to ethnicity has not been studied. We investigated if red blood cell thiopurine methyltransferase was subject to interethnic variation in a Saami (Lappish; n = 36) and a Caucasian population (n = 50). The Saami population sample had 29% higher thiopurine methyltransferase activity, 17.0 +/- 3.3 U/ml red blood cell compared with the Caucasian population sample, 13.1 +/- 2.9 U/ml red blood cell (p much less than 0.001). Probit plots and frequency distribution histograms supported bimodality consistent with genetic polymorphism in both study populations. Differences in chronic diseases, drug consumption, age, or gender could not explain the interethnic difference in red blood cell thiopurine methyltransferase activity. The higher red blood cell thiopurine methyltransferase activity in the Saami population group indicates that these subjects may require higher dosages of thiopurine drugs than Caucasians.

No abstract

Single cardiovascular risk factor intervention is probably not sufficient to prevent atherosclerosis progression. There is a lack of data on concomitant use of hypocholesterolemic agents and antihypertensive drugs with respect to possible interactions and adverse experiences. We studied 293 patients (below 65 years of age) under treatment with either lisinopril (n = 144) or nifedipine (n = 149) for mild to moderate hypertension for 10 weeks, and with serum cholesterol above 6.5 mmol/L, who were randomized to either lovastatin 20 mg every day or placebo in a double-blind, double-dummy design for 6 weeks. Lovastatin effectively lowered cholesterol by 16% and 15% in the lisinopril and nifedipine group respectively (P < .01 compared to placebo for both groups) without any negative impact on the antihypertensive efficacy of either lisinopril or nifedipine. The drugs in combination were well tolerated and did not affect the well-being of the patients, and did not cause any more adverse effects than the antihypertensive agents alone. Liver enzymes increased slightly during lovastatin therapy, while no case of myopathy was reported. Combined therapy with lovastatin and antihypertensive therapy can be safely undertaken.

No abstract