We compared, in a double-blind randomised study, intramuscular ketorolac 30 mg (n=49) and intramuscular pethidine 75 mg (n =51) for analgesia after elective caesarean section under general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone and suxamethonium and maintained with atracurium, nitrous oxide and isojlurane. Intravenous fentanyl 100 p.g was given after delivery of the neonate. In the recovery ward, patients who requested analgesia were allocated randomly to receive ketorolac 30 mg or pethidine 75 mg intramuscularly. Analgesia was assessed at intervals up to six hours, using a visual analogue scale and a four-point verbal scale, while duration of analgesia was taken as the time until the patient requested additional analgesia. There was no difference in the duration of analgesia between groups (Mann-Whitney test P=0.27, Mantel-Haentszel test P= 0.17). Twenty-six patients in the ketorolac group and 17 patients in the pethidine group requested further analgesia by 90 minutes. However, four patients in the ketorolac group and six patients in the pethidine group requested no further analgesia within 24 hours. Pain VAS and overall assessment of analgesia was similar between groups, although more side-effects (nausea, dizziness) were noted in the pethidine group. Ketorolac 30 mg and pethidine 75 mg provided similar but variable quality of analgesia after caesarean section.
Pain relief is an important component of modern obstetric care and can be produced by neuraxial, systemic, or inhalational analgesia or various physical techniques. We review the most recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of these techniques. Over the past decade, the availability of safer local anaesthetics, ultra-short acting opioids, combined spinal-epidural needles, patient-controlled analgesic devices, and ultrasound have revolutionised obstetric regional analgesia. Recent meta-analyses have supported epidural analgesia as the most efficacious technique, as it leads to higher maternal satisfaction and good maternal and fetal safety profiles. We examine the controversies and myths concerning the initiation, maintenance, and discontinuation of epidural
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.