Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has opened new horizons for intravascular coronary imaging. It utilizes near-infrared light to provide a microscopic insight into the pathology of coronary arteries in vivo. Optical coherence tomography is also capable of identifying the chemical composition of atherosclerotic plaques and detecting traits of their vulnerability. At present it is the only tool to measure the thickness of the fibrous cap covering the lipid core of the atheroma, and thus it is an exceptional modality to detect plaques that are prone to rupture (thin fibrous cap atheromas). Moreover, it facilitates distinguishing between plaque rupture and plaque erosion as a cause of acute intracoronary thrombosis. Optical coherence tomography is applied to guide angioplasties of coronary lesions and to assess outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions broadly. It identifies stent malapposition, dissections, and thrombosis with unprecedented precision. Furthermore, OCT helps to monitor vessel healing after stenting. It evaluates the coverage of stent struts by the neointima and detects in-stent neoatherosclerosis. With so much potential, new studies are warranted to determine OCT's clinical impact. The following review presents the technical background, basics of OCT image interpretation, and practical tips for adequate OCT imaging, and outlines its established and potential clinical application.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been clinically available for almost 25 years now and showed us valuable information regarding the coronary vessel lumen, its dimensions, the plaque burden and plaque characteristics that we were not able to assess by angiography alone. Using these abilities, IVUS has helped us to start, understand the atherosclerotic process in the coronary vessels. Further technical innovations partially overcame the somewhat limited image resolution of IVUS allowing more in-depth characterization and quantification of coronary plaque components. In addition, IVUS has been shown to be helpful to guide interventional procedures including optimal stent deployment in many clinical situations. In this review, we focus on the potential role of IVUS technology in interventional cardiology and on the valuable role of IVUS usage in percutaneous coronary interventions.

The OCT revealed a favorable healing pattern after BVS implantation in a STEMI population.

Objectives To assess feasibility, safety, angiographic, and clinical outcome of highly‐calcific carotid stenosis (HCCS) endovascular management using CGuard™ dual‐layer carotid stents. Background HCCS has been a challenge to carotid artery stenting (CAS) using conventional stents. CGuard combines a high‐radial‐force open‐cell frame conformability with MicroNet sealing properties. Methods The PARADIGM study is prospectively assessing routine CGuard use in all‐comer carotid revascularization patients; the focus of the present analysis is HCCS versus non‐HCCS lesions. Angiographic HCCS (core laboratory evaluation) required calcific segment length to lesion length ≥2/3, minimal calcification thickness ≥3 mm, circularity (≥3 quadrants), and calcification severity grade ≥3 (carotid calcification severity scoring system [CCSS]; G0‐G4). Results One hundred and one consecutive patients (51–86 years, 54.4% symptomatic; 106 lesions) received CAS (16 HCCS and 90 non‐HCCS); eight others (two HCCS) were treated surgically. CCSS evaluation was reproducible, with weighted kappa (95% CI) of 0.73 (0.58–0.88) and 0.83 (0.71–0.94) for inter‐ and intra‐observer reproducibility respectively. HCCS postdilatation pressures were higher than those in non‐HCCS; 22 (20–24) versus 20 (18–24) atm, p = .028; median (Q1–Q3). Angiography‐optimized HCCS‐CAS was feasible and free of contrast extravasation or clinical complications. Overall residual diameter stenosis was single‐digit but it was higher in HCCS; 9 (4–17) versus 3 (1–7) %, p = .002. At 30 days and 12 months HCCS in‐stent velocities were normal and there were no adverse clinical events. Conclusion CGuard HCCS endovascular management was feasible and safe. A novel algorithm to grade carotid artery calcification severity was reproducible and applicable in clinical study setting. Larger HCCS series and longer‐term follow‐up are warranted.