Systematic investigations were performed to study the dependence of the extraction efficiency of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including chlorobenzenes, HCH isomers, DDX, PCB congeners, and PAHs, on the accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) operating variables solvent and temperature. Mixed soil samples from two locations with considerable differences in soil properties and contamination in the Leipzig-Halle region (Germany) were used. The objective was to optimize ASE for the extraction of POPs from real soil samples and to improve on the results achieved with Soxhlet extraction (SOX). Solvents with differing polarities were tested. Quadruple and triple determinations were performed on the two soils, respectively, between 20 and 180 degrees C in 20 degrees C steps. All the results were compared with those obtained by SOX, as well as, in some cases during preliminary studies, by ultrasonic extraction (USE). In ASE, the optimum conditions proved to be two extraction steps at 80 and 140 degrees C (average RSD 10.7%) with three static cycles (extraction time 35 min) using toluene as solvent and at a pressure of 15 MPa. Owing to the superior analyte/matrix separation by ASE, in many cases for real soil samples analytical values better by up to 1 order of magnitude or even more were obtained compared to SOX results.
Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) was used for the simultaneous extraction of semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs) including chlorobenzenes (1,2,3,4-tetra-, penta-, hexachlorobenzene), HCH isomers (r-, -, γ-, δ-, E-HCH), DDX (p,p′-DDT, -DDE, -DDD), PCB congeners (28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180), and PAHs (phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo[a]pyrene) from mosses (Pleurozium schreberi) growing in regional locations (central Germany) and pine needles (Pinus sylvestris L.) from southern Russia (near the Caspian Sea). The results were compared with those obtained by ultrasonic extraction (USE). Using mixed moss samples (thorough cleanup, only minor interference during GC/ MSD analysis) from one location mainly served to optimize two parameters, extraction solvent and temperature. The most favorable extraction conditions proved to be nhexane as the extraction solvent, two temperature stages of 40 and 120°C, a pressure of 15 MPa, and three static cycles in each case. These conditions were then applied to the extraction of SOCs from the wax and the inner pine needle fraction, which beforehand had undergone extractive separation with dichloromethane. ASE was found to be especially advantageous in the case of higher multiple exposures to pollutants and the resultant complicated matrixes (oleiferous extracts, pollutant/matrix conjugates). Owing to the much better separation of analyte/ matrix, in many cases increases of 1-2 orders of magnitude were obtained in the analytical values of the contaminated sample materials compared to those obtained with USE.Over 130 anthropogenic organic substances which can have biological effects have been detected in European forestlands. Moreover, there is also an abundance of other organic substances accumulating in biomonitoring objects such as mosses and pine needles. These chemicals can significantly contribute to the multiple pollution of a location. The complicated plant matrix with large fractions of structures abundant in lipids, its diversity among different and even the same plant species from one location to another, and the effects of these and numerous other factors 1 make the extraction, cleanup, and analysis of lipophilic semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs) 2 a highly challenging process. Analytical difficulties in the analysis of pine needles in particular are due to multiple exposures to pollutants, depending on specific locations. Methodological improvements are making it possible to better understand the processes by which anthropogenic pollutants such as SOCs can penetrate and accumulate in plants, as well as the way in which they can also cause damage in the inner plant compartments. 3 In view of the known carcinogenic 4 and teratogenic 5 effects, as well as the endocrinic effects 6,7 recently mooted in particular for organochlorines, an improved quantitative determination of persistent organochlorines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biological compartments is essential if the hazards of these compounds are to be better assessed.Over ...
Currently, the evidence of a rapid photomodification of anthracene under sunlight resulting in enhanced toxicity exists; however, the chemical causes of toxicity are still unknown. The present study aimed at filling this gap by irradiation of an anthracene suspension with simulated sunlight and subsequent effect-directed fractionation and analysis of toxic products with respect to the inhibition of bacterial energy metabolism of Vibrio fischeri, reproduction of the green algae Scenedesmus vacuolatus, and genotoxicity in the umuC test. Algal toxicity of anthracene was hardly modified by irradiation prior to testing and distributed over all fractions with emphasis on the fractions containing anthracene-9,10-dione and a photometabolite suggested to be 10-hydroxyanthrone. Bacterial toxicity and genotoxicity in contrast emerged only when anthracene was irradiated. Anthracene-1,4-dione, a so-far-unknown trace photometabolite, was identified as a very potent toxicant dominating the toxicity of photomodified anthracene to V. fischeri. In genotoxic fractions, 1-hydroxyanthracene-9,10-dione and 1,4-dihydroxyanthracene-9,10-dione were identified and confirmed as genotoxicants. The results stress the potential of effect-directed analysis approaches in contrast to mere chemical analysis in studies aiming at toxicologically relevant photomodified substances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.