A new procedure for evaluating oropharyngeal dysphagia utilizing fiberoptic laryngoscopy was compared to the videofluoroscopy procedure. Twenty-one subjects were given both examinations within a 48-hour period. Results of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy examinations were compared for presence or absence of abnormal events. Good agreement was found, especially for the finding of aspiration (90% agreement). The FEES was then measured against the videofluoroscopy study for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Sensitivity was 0.88 or greater for three of the four parameters measured. Specificity was lower overall, but was still 0.92 for detection of aspiration. It was concluded that the FEES is a valid and valuable tool for evaluating oropharyngeal dysphagia. Some specific patients and conditions that lend themselves to this procedure are discussed.
This randomized, multicentre, parallel-group study assessed the efficacy of epoetin beta in reducing the transfusion frequency in patients ineligible for autologous blood donation prior to surgery. The patients (n = 194) received either epoetin beta (125 or 250 IU/kg, once weekly) or no therapy for 3–4 weeks before surgery. The pre-operation haemoglobin levels were markedly increased in the epoetin beta groups (125 IU/kg: +1.1 g/dl; 250 IU/kg: +1.6 g/dl), but not in the control group. The transfusion frequency was significantly reduced in both epoetin groups as compared with the control group (p = 0.046). Epoetin beta was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed. Low-dose administration of epoetin beta before elective surgery reduces the transfusion frequencies in patients not eligible for autologous blood donation.
Navigated shock-wave therapy significantly improves pain and shoulder function. Patients obtained nearly equal results after three low-energy or two middle-energy sessions of shock-wave treatment. We therefore recommend two sessions of middle-energy shock-wave therapy, as performed in Group II, because of the time-saving factor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.